Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first it is clearly referring to the unmodified source. The
second it has no other noun to refer to [...]
No noun except the altered source, the outcome of the first action?
Compare: if I say This box: I'll wrap it and post it to you then I
mean I'm
Hi all!
I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which
has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like
someone else to check over it, as I've not seen a licence exactly like
this one before.
Many thanks!
Julian
Licence follows:
Copyright (c)
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:10:17 +0100 Julian Gilbey wrote:
Hi all!
Hi! :)
I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which
has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like
someone else to check over it, as I've not seen a licence exactly like
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:10:17 +0100 Julian Gilbey wrote:
Hi all!
Hi! :)
I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which
has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like
someone else to check over it,
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it
freely, subject to the
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
including commercial applications, and to alter it and
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
Permission is granted to anyone to
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
I have started packaging petris, a command line tetris clone
(http://home1.stofanet.dk/peter-seidler/).
The README says:
LICENSE
You can do whatever you want with the program, it's Public Domain.
(however, it would be nice of you to credit me if you found anything
of this useful).
Is this
Scripsit Andree Leidenfrost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LICENSE
You can do whatever you want with the program, it's Public Domain.
(however, it would be nice of you to credit me if you found anything
of this useful).
Is this DFSG compliant?
Yes. (Jurisdiction that do not acknowledge authors'
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:29:25PM +1100, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
I have started packaging petris, a command line tetris clone
(http://home1.stofanet.dk/peter-seidler/).
The README says:
LICENSE
You can do whatever you want with the program, it's Public Domain.
(however, it would
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004, Roger Leigh wrote:
It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB references
removed,
Yeah, that's pretty much what it is.
but I'd just like to check with you that it is DFSG-free since it is
a different licence, and IANAL.
The following licence is in use by the libpqxx package (C++ binding
for PostgreSQL), and a companion library (libpqxx-object) which I am
writing. It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB
references removed, but I'd just like to check with you that it is
DFSG-free since it is a different
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:46:54PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The following licence is in use by the libpqxx package (C++ binding
for PostgreSQL), and a companion library (libpqxx-object) which I am
writing. It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB
references removed, but I'd just
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004, Roger Leigh wrote:
It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB references
removed,
Yeah, that's pretty much what it is.
but I'd just like to check with you that it is DFSG-free since it is
a different licence, and IANAL. In particular, the no advertising
without
15 matches
Mail list logo
