On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 14:25:47 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
> As others in this thread have pointed out, Debian explicitly omits
> classifying license fulltexts as "free software" or "non-free software".
Frankly speaking, I cannot find a message in this thread where others
pointed out that
2019-12-15 1:26:28 PM Jonas Smedegaard : [...]
> As others in this thread have pointed out, Debian explicitly omits
> classifying license fulltexts as "free software" or "non-free software".
>
> As I understand it, you personally classify license fulltexts as
> "non-free software" and then add a
Greetings, all!
[Lurker in the Debian space, decloaking to ask a clarification.]
On 15 Dec 2019, at 07:01, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> But can DFSG-free data be prepared for the test suite of a program
> intended to identify licenses?!? How can I test whether the program is
> able to identify
Quoting Francesco Poli (2019-12-15 13:01:16)
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:41:14 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > Quoting Francesco Poli (2019-12-14 17:22:09)
> [...]
> > > I don't think the exception may also apply when the license text
> > > is the *actual payload* of the package (for instance,
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:41:14 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Francesco Poli (2019-12-14 17:22:09)
[...]
> > I don't think the exception may also apply when the license text is
> > the *actual payload* of the package (for instance, a package shipping
> > the text for CC-by-nc-nd-v1.0,
Quoting Francesco Poli (2019-12-14 17:22:09)
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 14:01:18 +0100 Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
>
> > On 12/14/19 1:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > A rich collection of Free license fulltexts is relevant, not only
> > > for our users to pick from (even on a lonely island) and
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 14:01:18 +0100 Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
> On 12/14/19 1:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > A rich collection of Free license fulltexts is relevant, not only for
> > our users to pick from (even on a lonely island) and copy into new
> > development project, but also as
Quoting Baptiste BEAUPLAT (2019-12-14 15:12:38)
> On 12/14/19 2:01 PM, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
> > On 12/14/19 1:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> A rich collection of Free license fulltexts is relevant, not only
> >> for our users to pick from (even on a lonely island) and copy into
> >> new
On 12/14/19 2:01 PM, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
> On 12/14/19 1:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> A rich collection of Free license fulltexts is relevant, not only for
>> our users to pick from (even on a lonely island) and copy into new
>> development project, but also as reference e.g. for
On 12/14/19 1:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> A rich collection of Free license fulltexts is relevant, not only for
> our users to pick from (even on a lonely island) and copy into new
> development project, but also as reference e.g. for testing license
> checkers.
>
> What is _not_ helpful
Hi Baptiste,
Quoting Baptiste BEAUPLAT (2019-12-14 11:55:40)
> Yesterday, I was looking for the CC-BY license text to start a new
> project.
>
> I had to dig up to CreativeCommons's github repository to find the
> text version. (I didn't want to copy/paste the HTML version on their
>
Hi all,
Yesterday, I was looking for the CC-BY license text to start a new project.
I had to dig up to CreativeCommons's github repository to find the text
version. (I didn't want to copy/paste the HTML version on their website).
My question to you is: "Would it be interesting for others if I
12 matches
Mail list logo
