On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 00:29:14 + Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:08:03PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
While I won't actually try to use this as an argument of fact, the
majority of people I've spoken to about this don't feel happy about
declaring the QPL non-free.
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:08:03 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
While I won't actually try to use this as an argument of fact, the
majority of people I've spoken to about this don't feel happy about
declaring the QPL non-free.
I'm not happy either.
Still, I declare the QPL non-free, because I
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:08:03 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
While I won't actually try to use this as an argument of fact, the
majority of people I've spoken to about this don't feel happy about
declaring the QPL non-free.
I'm not happy either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the QPL is not a free license (although the
Fortunately, most people disagree.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, as a
special exception, the source code distributed need not include
anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary
form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the
operating system on which the
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 02:45:29AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
If it was
meant to include compiler-like tools, it would say the compiler used to
build the executable, but it clearly avoids that.
If this was true then the next sentence would not say this:
However, as a
special
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the QPL is not a free license (although the
Fortunately, most people disagree.
The lurkers support me in email
They all think I'm great don't you know.
You posters just don't understand
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the QPL is not a free license (although the
Fortunately, most people disagree.
The lurkers support me in email
While I won't actually try to use
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:08:03PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the QPL is not a free license (although the
Fortunately, most people disagree.
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:58:17PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:50:54AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
The source code for the documentation is embedded as comments in the
program source code, in a doxygen-like way.
Trolltech has not, to my knowledge,
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:34:52PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trolltech releases the Open Source Edition of Qt
under the GPL. The complete package
Andrew Suffield writes:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:58:17PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:50:54AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
The source code for the documentation is embedded as comments in the
program source code, in a doxygen-like way.
Trolltech
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:35:42PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:58:17PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:50:54AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
The source code for the documentation is embedded as comments in the
program source code, in a
Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trolltech releases the Open Source Edition of Qt
under the GPL. The complete package downloadable from
their website includes the libraries, tools like
qtdesigner, and documentation in .html format. Source
code for the libraries and tools is provided.
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:37:47 -0500 Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:35:42PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:58:17PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
[...]
The GPL says:
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work
for making
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:37:47AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source
code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any
associated
Trolltech releases the Open Source Edition of Qt
under the GPL. The complete package downloadable from
their website includes the libraries, tools like
qtdesigner, and documentation in .html format. Source
code for the libraries and tools is provided.
However, no source code is provided for the
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 03:24:30AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trolltech releases the Open Source Edition of Qt
under the GPL. The complete package downloadable from
their website includes the libraries, tools like
qtdesigner, and documentation in .html format. Source
code for the
--- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er... huh? There is lots of material in the world
that is maintained in
HTML as the source format. How do you know what the
source form is for this
documentation if that source form has not been
distributed to us?
Elementary, my dear fellow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trolltech releases the Open Source Edition of Qt
under the GPL. The complete package downloadable from
their website includes the libraries, tools like
qtdesigner, and documentation in .html format. Source
code for the libraries and tools is provided.
However, no
--- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er... huh? There is lots of material in the world
that is maintained in
HTML as the source format. How do you know what the
source form is for this
documentation if that source form has not been
distributed to us?
[Please ignore my previous
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er... huh? There is lots of material in the world
that is maintained in
HTML as the source format. How do you know what
the
source form is for this
documentation if that source form has not been
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trolltech releases the Open Source Edition of Qt
under the GPL. The complete package downloadable from
their website includes the libraries, tools like
qtdesigner, and documentation in .html format.
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trolltech releases the Open Source Edition of Qt
under the GPL. The complete package downloadable from
their website includes the libraries, tools like
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:50:54AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
The source code for the documentation is embedded as comments in the
program source code, in a doxygen-like way.
Trolltech has not, to my knowledge, released the tool they use to
generate the HTML from the comments.
25 matches
Mail list logo
