Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog

Ben Finney writes ("Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog"): > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > > But the requirement for a click-through can and should be removed. > > Whether a particular “build an installer” tool

Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog

Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > Florian Weimer writes ("Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license > dialog"): > > * Mark Weyer: > > > If its license is pristine GPL then you as a maintainer have the > > >

Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog

Florian Weimer writes ("Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog"): > * Mark Weyer: > > If its license is pristine GPL then you as a maintainer have the right to > > remove the click-wrap functionality. > > You may not completely remove any su

Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog

* Mark Weyer: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 01:29:31PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: >> OBS (https://obsproject.com/) is licensed under GPL-2. >> However, it needs to accept license dialog to use it when you start program. >> Is it dfsg-free one? I think it would be like click-wrap software. > > If

Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog

Thank you, Mark and Ben. Now I understand this click-wrap issue, anyway it is under GPL-2 even its dialog exists or not. And probably it'd be better to ask upstream to just show license not show "accept" dialog. -- Hideki Yamane

Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog

Hideki Yamane writes: > OBS (https://obsproject.com/) is licensed under GPL-2. The specific grant throughout much of the code base at is the standard GPLv2-or-later text: This program is free software: you can redistribute

licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog

Hi, OBS (https://obsproject.com/) is licensed under GPL-2. However, it needs to accept license dialog to use it when you start program. Is it dfsg-free one? I think it would be like click-wrap software. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org

Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 01:29:31PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > OBS (https://obsproject.com/) is licensed under GPL-2. > However, it needs to accept license dialog to use it when you start program. > Is it dfsg-free one? I think it would be like click-wrap software. If its license is pristine