Quoting Mark Rafn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here's a thought: Dual-licensed works can generally be forked to be under
either license. Doesn't this mean that the maintainer (or any distributor)
of a GPLv2 or any later version work could unilaterally re-release it
under pure GPLv2 without
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, paul cannon wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug, 2003 at 06:43:48PM -0500, Rick Moen wrote:
...or (at your [the recipient's] option) any later version. The fact
that your refers to the _recipient_ means that Scott's worst-case
scenario of FSF issuing a screwball GPLv3 is not a
2 matches
Mail list logo
