After the last round of discussions, the LaTeX Project has asked me to
review and present a new revision of the LPPL, which is attached below.
It is unlikely that I will be able to participate in the discussion this
time around due to time constraints, but the LaTeX people should be
around to
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:49:46PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Dmitry Borodaenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
even to its creator, 'form preferred for modification' should be chosen
from forms remaining in existence.
You shouldn't be choosing at all. You should provide everything that
is
Scripsit Adam Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 02:54, Henning Makholm wrote:
It must be possible for me to enjoy the freedoms without
communicating with anybody else but those whom I voluntarily
decide to distribute the software to.
Why should I have to
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you should only provide the C source, because the binaries being
distributed are those of the modified C program. Once I've started
editing the C program, I've made it unambiguously clear that this is the
preferred form for modifications; just
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:25:42AM -0400, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you should only provide the C source, because the binaries being
distributed are those of the modified C program. Once I've started
editing the C program, I've made it
On Tuesday, Jun 17, 2003, at 07:03 US/Eastern, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
The issue of storage is more controversial, all I can
give is my personal opinion that it is fair to expect that creators
keep
track of at least their own work,
I don't think its reasonable to expect me to keep track of
W liście z wto, 17-06-2003, godz. 02:09, Artur R. Czechowski pisze:
Hi!
As apparently nobody replied to this (at least - not to me) I'd try
to say how *I* understood the situation and what would I propose.
III. Questions.
1. Are those licenses not conflicting with each other?
I think no.
You
Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After the last round of discussions, the LaTeX Project has asked me to
review and present a new revision of the LPPL, which is attached below.
It is unlikely that I will be able to participate in the discussion this
time around due to time constraints,
Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are a number of icons and images in
products whose original creator preferred to edit in photoshop, with crazy
psd files that contain layering, gamma, and other useful information. I
made further modifications to the resulting GIF file. My
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:24:09AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
After the last round of discussions, the LaTeX Project has asked me to
review and present a new revision of the LPPL, which is attached below.
It is unlikely that I will be able to participate in the discussion this
time around
10 matches
Mail list logo
