Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After the last round of discussions, the LaTeX Project has asked me to > review and present a new revision of the LPPL, which is attached below. > > It is unlikely that I will be able to participate in the discussion this > time around due to time constraints, but the LaTeX people should be > around to hear your feedback. > > The parts of the license that have caused the most friction in the past > are now fully contained within clause 6. I doubt that any other part of > the license will be seen as objectionable (except, possibly, in their > invokation of clause 6). It is my opinion that clause 6 does not > violate the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
It is my opinion, on first read-through, that this version would satisfy the DFSG. I hope others will agree. Many many thanks Jeff for your persistence in getting this issue settled! Thomas