* David M.Besonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060204 00:41]:
does the gpl (v2 or v3-draft) address the issue of hosted apps?
The gpl v2 does so perfectly, the v3 draft currently has some clause
that will likely allow making programs non-free by restrict usage as
hosted application.
specifically, does
Quoting Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One of the questions with the GPL is about how tightly you may link
GPL code with non-GPL code, for example, when you compile a GPL
program and it uses other code in a software library. Have you done
anything to define how tightly GPL code
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:31:38 +1100, Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
i challenge any of you zealots to come up with a REAL WORLD, PRACTICAL
proof that the GFDL is non-free (and i mean actually non-free, not
merely inconvenient. the DFSG does not require convenience, only
freedom).
You have got to look at this. Its outstanding. Its a major new business
http://www.judgmentprocessing.com/contents.htm/
audrie
Want to not receive info in the future? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Walter Landry wrote:
olive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, there are licenses which in my opinion more clearly violates
the DFSGL and are nevertheless accepted. I think of a license of a file
in x.org which prohibit to export it to Cuba. This seems clearly be a
discrimination and
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:59:45AM +0400, olive wrote:
Walter Landry wrote:
olive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, there are licenses which in my opinion more clearly violates
the DFSGL and are nevertheless accepted. I think of a license of a file
in x.org which prohibit to export it
6 matches
Mail list logo
