After cautiously reading you message, here are my intends about the listed
files. Please correct me if you think I'm wrong.
[CRUFT] Remove from any package
[NON-FREE] Move to non-free
[MAIN] Keep in main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) writes:
Files in the /etc directory of emacs21
Has anyone looked at Disney's Panda3d Public License Version 2.0?
http://www.panda3d.org/license.php
Clause 4 seems worrysome (requires sending signifigant changes to Disney).
Other parts seem redundant with copyright law.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone looked at Disney's Panda3d Public License Version 2.0?
http://www.panda3d.org/license.php
Clause 4 seems worrysome (requires sending signifigant changes to Disney).
Other parts seem redundant with copyright law.
Hi,
Frank said:
assume a document licensed under GFDL, with no invariant sections (and
...) has a front cover text (like A GNU Manual) and a back cover text
[...]
What should the developers do in order to make it DFSG-free [...]
This implies that a document with no invariant sections, but
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Frank said:
assume a document licensed under GFDL, with no invariant sections (and
...) has a front cover text (like A GNU Manual) and a back cover text
[...]
What should the developers do in order to make it DFSG-free [...]
This implies that a document with no
Jérôme Marant wrote:
After cautiously reading you message, here are my intends about the listed
files. Please correct me if you think I'm wrong.
[CRUFT] Remove from any package
[NON-FREE] Move to non-free
[MAIN] Keep in main
I agree with all of these, except:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This implies that a document with no invariant sections, but with
one-sentence front- and back-cover sections does not meet the DFSG?
Is that Debian's position?
Debian's position is:
: that works that don't include any Invariant Sections, Cover Texts,
:
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's not clear to me that the GFDL prohibits DRM where
a parallel distribution mechanism is guaranteed to be available.
The copying to the DRM-controlled media seems expressly prohibited.
If free parallel distribution is guaranteed to be available,
relevant, and
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the other hand, kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386.deb by the Debian kernel
team, based on the Linux kernel by Linus Torvalds and others seems to
be accurate credit, doesn't it?
It's an arguably accurate description, but strikes me as an arguably
misleading credit.
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:28:03 + MJ Ray wrote:
Long term, hosting it yourself under a distributed RCS and using
something like DOAP to keep project metadata seems the best bet. If
others would like to help document the tools and methods, please let
me
On 3/25/06, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's not clear to me that the GFDL prohibits DRM where
a parallel distribution mechanism is guaranteed to be available.
The copying to the DRM-controlled media seems expressly prohibited.
Only if these copies are are
11 matches
Mail list logo
