I'm working on packaging a some software that uses this license. Is
this an acceptable license from a debian perspective?
Thanks, -Brian
COPYRIGHT AND LICENCE
Copyright (c) 2005-2006 University of Illinois Board of Trustees
All rights reserved.
Developed by: Campus Information
Scripsit John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The BCFG public license (below) seems pretty much like a standard BSD
+ advertising clause license. I can't quite seem to remember what the
current policy on that sort of license is.
We accept them, but grudgingly.
7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL DATA FROM THE
UNITED STATES MAY REQUIRE SOME FORM OF EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE FROM THE
U.S. GOVERNMENT AND THAT FAILURE TO OBTAIN SUCH EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE
MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL
Brian Elliott Finley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on packaging a some software that uses this license. Is
this an acceptable license from a debian perspective?
Looks like 3-clause BSD, which is absolutely fine.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a heads-up.
http://gplv3.fsf.org/
There's a lot of complicated wording changes from the first draft of the
GPL v.3.
(They all look like improvements to me, but there's a lot to digest.)
And there's a new draft
Scripsit Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL DATA FROM THE
UNITED STATES MAY REQUIRE SOME FORM OF EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE FROM THE
U.S. GOVERNMENT AND THAT FAILURE TO OBTAIN SUCH EXPORT
On 7/28/06, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL DATA FROM THE
UNITED STATES MAY REQUIRE SOME FORM OF EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE FROM THE
Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 à 23:36 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
Le ven 28 juillet 2006 23:26, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 à 22:40 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
It would be interesting to start a formal enquiry if this applies
to Bittorrent.
it is
versions to play those DVDs. If the work communicates with an online
service, it must be possible for modified versions to communicate with
the same online service in the same way such that the service cannot
distinguish.) A key need not be included in cases where use of the
This is bad for
Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
versions to play those DVDs. If the work communicates with an online
service, it must be possible for modified versions to communicate with
the same online service in the same way such that the service cannot
On 7/29/06, Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
versions to play those DVDs. If the work communicates with an online
service, it must be possible for modified versions to communicate with
the same online service in the
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, it means that the licensee is obliged to agree that a fact may be
true.
And if that fact is not agreeable to me, I may not copy the software?
If you're unwilling to agree to truth statements, then yes,
This one time, at band camp, Henning Makholm said:
Scripsit Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL DATA FROM THE
UNITED STATES MAY REQUIRE SOME FORM OF EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE FROM THE
Scripsit Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if that fact is not agreeable to me, I may not copy the software?
If you're unwilling to agree to truth statements, then yes, I'm entirely
happy with you not being permitted to copy the software. It
Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even moving all logic to the server side can't stop it. Online games
especially need to be able to distinguish the 'official' client from a
modified one. Even if all logic is on the server side, the client
still
On 7/29/06, Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FSF is really not concerned about online games. That is because there is
no way to block draconian DRM restrictions
while aproviding a means to autheniticate an official game client. They
really are the same problem.
The issue is how the GPLv3
16 matches
Mail list logo
