Francesco Poli wrote:
Wait, wait!
Nah, release often, release soon :P
The key question here is: does the DFSG-free part *require* the
non-free part for compilation or use?
Yes.
In other words: does the DFSG-free game provide *no* significant
functionality *without* the non-free data
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
Package name: ttf-tuffy
Version : 20050130
Upstream Author : Thatcher Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://tulrich.com/fonts/
License : Public Domain
Description : The Tuffy Font Family
In the tarball
Hi,
I watched Sun's Simon Phipps' talk at debconf 2006 few weeks ago.
It was mentioned that the choice of venue was useless and would be
removed from CDDL, thus making CDDL DSFG-compliant.
Does anybody know if is it still a work in progress? Does anyone have
contacts with Sun people about the
This one time, at band camp, Fabian Greffrath said:
Public Domain Fonts
Here are my dabblings in font design. I have placed them in the
Public Domain. This is all 100% my own work. Usage is totally
unrestricted. If you want to make derivative works for any
Hello,
I'd like to post some Debian disk images, created from original
Debian packages, to some sites via http or bittorrent. What legal
obligations have I or the hosting site? If the packages are all from
the /main repository, and presumably mostly GPL, do I have to make
the sources available or
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I watched Sun's Simon Phipps' talk at debconf 2006 few weeks ago.
It was mentioned that the choice of venue was useless and would be
removed from CDDL, thus making CDDL DSFG-compliant.
Does anybody know
Le vendredi 01 décembre 2006 18:44, Mike Hommey a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I watched Sun's Simon Phipps' talk at debconf 2006 few weeks ago.
It was mentioned that the choice of venue was useless and would be
removed
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 06:47:30PM +0100, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Le vendredi 01 décembre 2006 18:44, Mike Hommey a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I watched Sun's Simon Phipps' talk at debconf 2006 few
Unless they upgrade the license of such software, I guess?
Which would be relicensing and requires agreement from all contributors,
as any other relicensing.
Exactly. But it should not be a problem for Sun products I'm thinking
about.
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Ottavio Caruso:
I'd like to post some Debian disk images, created from original
Debian packages, to some sites via http or bittorrent. What legal
obligations have I or the hosting site? If the packages are all from
the /main repository, and presumably mostly GPL, do I have to make
the
=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I watched Sun's Simon Phipps' talk at debconf 2006 few weeks ago.
It was mentioned that the choice of venue was useless and would be
removed from CDDL, thus making CDDL DSFG-compliant.
CDDL also discriminates against agents acting on behalf
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that even if that happens, that won't change the licensing terms
for the software already released under current CDDL.
It will, unless the Initial Developer says not:
4.2. Effect of New Versions.
You may always continue to use, distribute or otherwise
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:51:35 +0100 Amaya wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
The non-free data could be distributed in non-free, to the extent
they are legally redistributable by Debian. Otherwise, they must be
downloadable via script from a server that has actually permission
to
13 matches
Mail list logo
