Francesco Poli wrote:
The restriction in the GPL is about the act of conveying copies of the
work.
The restriction in the AGPL is about *using* the modified work: there's
a cost associated with *use*...
But surely the entire point in question is whether presenting the UI to
someone across the
Le mercredi 13 juin 2007 à 01:27 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Bad: use restriction, with a cost associated to it
A better wording would then be:
... an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source under
the same conditions as those of using the Program.
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The current wording is way too specific, and requires providing the
source at no charge on a network server. In the event where the user
pays for using the service, the source code availability would then
have to be included in the price.
That seems
Le jeudi 14 juin 2007 à 09:36 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The current wording is way too specific, and requires providing the
source at no charge on a network server. In the event where the user
pays for using the service, the source code
4 matches
Mail list logo
