Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The current wording is way too specific, and requires providing the > source at no charge on a network server. In the event where the user > pays for using the service, the source code availability would then > have to be included in the price.
That seems to be intentional (on the part of the AGPL authors), no? -- \ "My house is on the median strip of a highway. You don't really | `\ notice, except I have to leave the driveway doing 60 MPH." -- | _o__) Steven Wright | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
