Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
We would ask you to move away from using {M,m}-e-e-{G,g}-o or any subset of
those letters or sounds in that order, alone or in combination with other
letters, words or marks that would tend to cause someone to make a
reasonable connection of the reference with the MeeGo
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
To start with, the goal is to avoid any confusion around what is and
what is not MeeGo. Anything that is or will become associated with
the MeeGo trademark has to be in conformance with the compliance
program.
Unfortunately, there's no way that
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Ibrahim Haddad ibra...@linux.com wrote:
We would ask you to move away from using {M,m}-e-e-{G,g}-o or any subset of
those letters or sounds in that order, alone or in combination with other
letters, words or marks that would tend to cause someone to make a
On Fr, 2010-12-10 at 11:24 +, MJ Ray wrote:
Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
We would ask you to move away from using {M,m}-e-e-{G,g}-o or any subset of
those letters or sounds in that order, alone or in combination with other
letters, words or marks that would tend to cause someone to make a
Hello all:
I'm in the process of packaging kstars-data-extra-tycho2 (
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-
pkglist?action=details;package=kstars-data-extra-tycho2 ) and after long and
detailed conversationw with original developer Mr. Akarsh Simha from KStars
team, the point is as
On 12/10/2010 4:38 AM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Fr, 2010-12-10 at 11:24 +, MJ Ray wrote:
Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
We would ask you to move away from using {M,m}-e-e-{G,g}-o or any subset of
those letters or sounds in that order, alone or in combination with other
letters, words or marks
Hello,
I ran into a data-file which is a CDF V2 Document, No summary info,
according to /usr/bin/file. To my surprise there seems to be nothing
in Debian which supports this format. The canonical CDF library
appears to live at http://cdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/ and has a license (
Teemu Ikonen tpiko...@gmail.com writes:
The conclusion I draw from the threads above is that the license above
is DFSG-free.
I agree with you, but also with those who observed that the notion of a
federal agency holding copyright is a bit odd; published US government
work falls into the public
On 12/10/2010 11:31 AM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
I agree with you, but also with those who observed that the notion of a
federal agency holding copyright is a bit odd; published US government
work falls into the public domain, and I would expect a work for hire
(by a contractor) to have a
9 matches
Mail list logo
