On Thu, 09 Dec 2010, Ibrahim Haddad wrote: > To start with, the goal is to avoid any confusion around what is and > what is not MeeGo. Anything that is or will become associated with > the MeeGo trademark has to be in conformance with the compliance > program.
Unfortunately, there's no way that Debian can possibly comply with the compliance specification as written. [I only got as far as ยง2.3 to find an obvious deal-breaker.] This sounds like yet another case where an unbranded name[1] is required for actual use in the community, ala iceweasel. Don Armstrong 1: wontgo came to mind immediately, but something slightly less antagonistic can probably be though of. -- There is no mechanical problem so difficult that it cannot be solved by brute strength and ignorance. -- William's Law http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
