On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:47:37 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> > The response is:
> > | There is no record of the reasons other than the reasons stated in
> > | my blog post of August 9, 2006
> > | (http://creativecommons.org/w
don't know...
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpyK9I1gYDKU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:49:35 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 24 septembre 2006 à 23:32 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
[...]
> > Here, the restriction clearly forbids creating a derivative work
> > that is a drop-in replacement of the original, and thus inte
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:31:21 +0200 (MEST) Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
[> Francesco Poli wrote]
> > Maybe another person who recommends the GPL could be useful to add
> > "pressure" to adopt a DFSG-free licensing scheme... I don't know...
> Neither do I, but if
where the licensor is the license drafter...
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
p
ot;I like pasta because the sky is blue."
>
> > They don't have source codes. Or, some different
> > formats can be considered as a source (lossy
> > compressed formats), but some formats cannot (DRM).
>
> Above, the XCF is clearly described as the source m
;-)
If upstream is persuaded to do what I described above, we could manage
to reach this goal!
Usual disclaimers: IANADD, IANAL.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Fr
tributing the sourceless GPL'd work
The usual disclaimers: IANAL, IANADD.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE
rmits this, and that the
> existing wording already makes this true accross jurisdictions, but
> that it should indeed be made more explicit (this is my understanding
> from Mia Garlick's responses to the list commentary).
This would be an improvement, but I have yet to see the new clause
phrasing, before I can comment.
>
> As a Debian user, I am furthermore concerned that continuing to push
> for a TPM+parallel distribution clause will damage the freedom of the
> Debian distribution and free software / free culture in general,
It cannot harm freedom.
Likewise, a non-copyleft license cannot harm freedom (as long as it
meets the DFSG).
Allowing parallel distribution could harm copyleft, or maybe not.
*Not* allowing parallel distribution could harm freedom, or maybe not.
These are the points to be discussed, really.
[...]
> Anyway, that's my case both for accepting the CCPL3.0 w/o the parallel
> distribution clause, and also for generally considering the parallel
> distribution not to be required for "DFSG freedom". Thanks for
> reading.
Thanks for writing.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpLf0ZCmzuTs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:45:46 -0500 Terry Hancock wrote:
[...]
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Wait, wait: if the TPM are based on public key cryptography, you
> > could have the necessary key for applying them, but not the key
> > that's needed to pull them off. In that
.org/licenses/info/BSD_3Clause.html
| * the GNU GPL version 2
|http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.txt
| * the Expat/MIT license
|http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:40:09 -0500 Terry Hancock wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:45:46 -0500 Terry Hancock wrote:
> > > So, are you asserting that if the CCPL3.0 included an allowance to
> > > distribute TPM'd files, so long as the key
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:06:25 +0200 Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > Good job!
>
> Thanks, that helps me going. :)
You are welcome...
[...]
> > These considerations lead to the following proposed rephrasing:
> >
&
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:49:48 +0200 Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > I don't know whether I'll have enough time to do it personally.
> > Let's do as follows: I see if I can modify the wiki page on Sunday;
> > y
e authors of
other comparable contributions", it would be OK, but the actual clause
doesn't say this, unfortunately.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpGu1LZDkFyy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpqWzSt6KAkm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:50:04 +0100 Lewis Jardine wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Clause 4(d) states, in part:
> >
> > | in the case of a Adaptation or Collection, at a minimum such
> > | credit will appear, if a credit for all contributing authors
>
ways
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpjjyKxljKAN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpm5671CSwy9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ange, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp90nd6fgC8K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
] http://bugs.debian.org/395961
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpjnKzStFCjR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:10:49 +0800 Tim Post wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 18:14 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Hi all! :)
> >
> > I filed a RFP wishlist bug about a very interesting
> > scientific/technical data visualizer called VisIt (see bug #395573
&
a given grammar: bison
comes to mind).
> Right now there doesn't seem to be a strong opinion in the
> project about that, but I expect it's a discussion that needs to be
> had.
IMO, this discussion desperately needs to be had. I think the right
time to have it is after etch i
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:29:45 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:16:11 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
[...]
> > One thing that was not yet pointed out is that this license, besides
> > the other issues, als
_Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpNLSyBsZCBw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[1], as far
as non-programmatic works and DFSG#2 are concerned.
The discussion about source code of non-programmatic works is
(unfortunately) still to be had.
[1] see the thread that started with
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/10/msg00185.html
--
But it is also tradition that times *
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:20:43 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Nope, because you can ship the source code and the o
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:38:34 +0100 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> md wrote:
> > On Oct 31, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > IMHO, DFSG#2 refers to source code, as is usually defined, that is
> > > to say, as in the GNU GPL v2.
> > No, it does no
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:37:19 +0100 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:38:34 +0100 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> > > But if I release a .ps file, it would be output from
> > > LaTeX and so it seems reasonable to insist that the soft
-- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpZMr2GdM2cp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rred for making modifications to the work...
[...]
> (Not a debian developer or a lawyer. Just a user).
The same holds for me: IANAL, IANADD.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpucxqXXTi56.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rom _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpVpdVxxCrb5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eed to
> provide C versions of the modifications.
[...]
Good: this is the kind of explanation that my previous message lacked...
Again thanks for clarifying.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpw8B4ynzCdV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nd. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpf8TICqa3ZK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rd
ways: that doesn't necessarily mean that they are right!
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp5IddQIGIV4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:53:49 +0200 Yasen Pramatarov wrote:
> Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:26:42 +0100 Francesco Poli :
[...]
> > The issue here is making available all the necessary data for
> > modifying the work in an optimal way: doing otherwise puts the
> > origina
e avoidance of doubt, this trademark restriction does not
| form part of this License. For the avoidance of doubt, this
^
| trademark restriction does not form part of the License.
^^^^^
the software source.
Exactly!
Thanks for taking the time to read my replies and to think about them.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key f
otcd/bootcd_2.53/bootcd.copyright
[2] http://packages.debian.org/bootcd
[3] see GPLv2#9 for further details
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpa8Um0lvBlQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpGhlBD5K15h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:51:35 +0100 Amaya wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > The non-free data could be distributed in non-free, to the extent
> > they are legally redistributable by Debian. Otherwise, they must be
> > downloadable via script from a server that has actua
nd always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp8ouy9qCht2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp3yjDk3xl7q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d you please explain?
P.S.: Please note that I'm Cc:ing the debian-legal public mailing list,
since the issue has been previously raised there. Could you please keep
debian-legal in Cc: in your reply? Thanks.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:14:44 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Should I ask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to provide an authoritative answer
> > about this situation?
>
> I think that in this case, the meaning of the statement depends on the
> auth
e I Cc:ed debian-legal, just to notify that the question has been
asked to the FSF and that a public response from them was desired.
Hope that explains.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..
unambiguous meaning.
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpPUZESiCgUL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 28 Feb 2005 12:25:52 GMT MJ Ray wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 25 Feb 2005 11:17:19 GMT MJ Ray wrote:
> > > Well-meaning authors can go look at similar packages already
> > > in main and check the copyright file.
> > Imitating
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpMOBWlNw032.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e code.
If C code can be considered "free enough" under some circumstances, why
is it not always good enough?
Because it's not always the "preferred form for modification", that's
why!
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterd
e source code
> requirement of the DFSG any more than a compiled binary does; if it
> does, we have a problem. Undocumented code, on the other hand, while
> rather annoying, is not an issue of freedom.
I entirely agree!
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
style can be improved to serve this purpose
better, but the need holds.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C97
day is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp8PwbPUJivq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ct promises to avoid them.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp1zQQc4vzV6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
body from modifying the work easily.
I agree.
The above question is a good "rule of thumb", as you stated.
But the definition of source code is different: as I said, the best I've
seen is the GPL one ("preferred form for modification").
--
Today is the t
ckage is DFSG-free itself
The same applies to images with no source available or with source that
requires non-free components.
Of course, when source is really unavailable: sometimes the PNG image is
source itself, sometimes it's not...
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about y
y is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpmolLzfdX6J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:40:52 -0800 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:15:20PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:16:46 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
> > I think that these issues are sarge-ignore because of GR2004-004,
> > but wil
hors keep suitable formats to modify images, but
fail to provide the form that they prefer.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
ode cannot be
obtained too easily from the distributed bytecode).
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpoy3ZiWz1TC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
lf seems to be a necessary condition for distributing
modified binaries...
Does this pass the Dissident test?
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD
e code may change
format back to Fortran (or maybe not).
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpCVVVJvuLTt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:42:58 + Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > But in the case of the photographer Laura, if she thinks (in good
> > faith) that she has the JPEG only, then JPEG is her preferred form
> > for modific
source, it
> violates Free Software's principles to expect others to edit the
> preprocessor or compiler output to modify the software.
Indeed.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
France
plies to
programs only.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpwuBBLdACsG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t hex string was actually modified (or going to be modified in
case a modification was needed) in that form, then, yes, it was source.
Hard to read source, but still source.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
nly Suggests: python-doc, so pythin would stay in
main
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:01:35 +0100 Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Interestingly enough, you also cited Java -> bytecode compilation:
> > I've been told that Java decompilers can recover even variable
> > identifiers f
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:51:11 + Henning Makholm wrote:
[please send replies to the list, as I'm a subscriber and didn't asked
to get replies twice; thank you]
> Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On the other hand, we must adopt a source code defi
omorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpsGQ3VRh4cm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 06 Mar 2005 14:41:23 GMT MJ Ray wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps a (wishlist?) bug should be file against the latex2html
> > package. What do you think?
>
> Such a good idea that Roland Stigge already did it:
> http://bugs.debian
r too, and without any NVidia's
binary kernel module.
No accelerated 3D graphics, but the videocard works for 2D.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli
> the v2 license.)
Evan Prodromou put a summary online regarding the CC-2.0 licenses:
http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli
t the drafter shall not apply to
> this License.
It's a kind of magic, I suppose! ;-)
Can I write my own license that says "any law or regulation that I don't
like shall not apply to this license"?
Would it mean that I magically nuke laws as I like?
--
Today is
y is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp9mlmaU2hgH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
es are GPL-compatible.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpcAIVE
t the drafter
> shall not apply to this License.
Another magic license which claims to have the Power-to-nuke-laws(TM).
Maybe it's the way to deal with software patents: publish under a
license that says "The application of patent laws is expressly
excluded".
--
Today is
is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpUg212ma3AH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
omorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpAB3RuxFptX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
h programs and
other kind of works.
[1] This more or less means Expat, X11, 2-clause BSD or 3-clause BSD...
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG
SS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
| See the licenses for more details.
And do not forget to ship a copy of the GNU GPL v2 along with the
document (a text file containing the GPL and accompanying the document
will suffice).
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
"GPLv3
or later" *and* include the "Invariant Sections" (that you will never be
able to drop!). :-(
To conclude, IMHO, it's a matter of trust.
Release under "GPLv2 or later" if you trust the FSF to never screw
things up with future GPL
re community.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpsrAQzV3WwJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
equence, Linux (as a whole) is under "GPLv2 only".
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B
hen you combined two
GPLv2-licensed works into one derivative and complied with both
instances of GPLv2, by releasing W_d source code under the GPLv2 itself,
not adding further restrictions, and so forth...
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
...
later"
> language. The above problem doesn't go away, though.
Agreed entirely.
The "or later" trick works as long as the FSF is trusted to actually fix
problems and release better and better GPL versions.
But I'm not sure that this trust is deserved any longer...
ely agreed.
>
> - What happens if the program interacts with other programs over a
>network? How do you define "interacting with a user"?
Who knows?
I agree that this is very gray and unclear.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
it.
>
> That's no longer the case, unfortunately.
The same happened to me.
They undermined their good reputation with the GFDL affair, IMHO.
Especially for how they are (not) dealing with it and for how much they
are (not) caring about others' opinions... :-(((
--
g changes due to MJ Ray
> * Additional phrasing changes due to Francesco Poli
Wow! Thanks for the credit! :)
[...]
> Debian [DEBIAN]_ is an operating system consisting entirely of Free
> Software. Our definition of "Free Software" is specified in the
> Debian Free Software Guidelin
e not DFSG-free, which is clearly absurd.
Agreed entirely.
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C9
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:49:34 +0100 (MET) Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> > From: Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> > I don't think it's forbidding to remove the code: it's merely
> > forbidding to drop a feature.
> > You could reimplemen
! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpV4HtheReiP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:13:46 +0100 Lewis Jardine wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:27:57 -0500 Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> >
> > [anti-DRM clause]
> >
> >>In terms of suggesting a textual fix, how about:
> >>
> &g
til they are willing to
speak with you and Benjamin (and other debian representatives)?
Take into account that IANADD, as you may already know (but it's better
to remind this...).
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
..
ations, literature, ...
>
> This is the reason because I hope that this project will go further.
> But, as I said, it's just my personal view.
We hope to solve this issue, too.
>
>
> Hope to be useful to the discussion
I think you are.
--
:-( This U
he long lasting discussions about "What is software?" that sprang up
during the neverending GFDL story...
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
..
Francesco Poli
ed.
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpzTVXiyrgcv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:59:08 +0200 Thomas wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > Hi Thomas!
> >
>
> ciao Franceso
Please, do not reply to me directly Cc:ing the list, as I didn't ask it.
Better reply to the list only, instead: I'm a subscriber and w
we have more than 5000 articles and images on
> Wikitravel alone, and I'd say that's more than enough to call them
> "many".
This sounds like a good idea: it even enhances the summary longevity (it
will be true in the foreseeable future, as well as now).
--
:-(
mple proof that you're right. :) You can't
> draw a strict boundary between overlapping sets.
Indeed.
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
..
Francesco
501 - 600 of 1628 matches
Mail list logo
