Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:54:00 + MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
What extra restrictions? The exceptions looked like actual
exceptions, assuming that identify their use of FLTK is in the
LGPL-2.1... which it appears to be, in section 1.
Could you please
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org wrote in message
news:49c8da6f.7050...@debian.org...
4. You do not have to provide a copy of the FLTK license
with programs that are linked to the FLTK library, nor
do you have to identify the FLTK license in your
program or
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:43:14 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:54:00 + MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
What extra restrictions? The exceptions looked like actual
exceptions, assuming that identify their use of FLTK is in the
LGPL-2.1... which it appears to
Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it wrote:
As Joe Smith has just explained in more detail, one of the two license
versions includes a more specific requirement to embed a verbatim
sentence in user documentation: I cannot find any such restriction in
the GNU LGPL v2.1...
I was looking at the
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:54:00 + MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
What extra restrictions? The exceptions looked like actual
exceptions, assuming that identify their use of FLTK is in the
LGPL-2.1... which it appears to be, in section 1.
Could you please elaborate on this?
I cannot find any requirement
In message 49c9a819.rvf2v61xchuvg7vu%...@phonecoop.coop, MJ Ray
m...@phonecoop.coop writes
Olive not0read0...@yopmail.com wrote:
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
I don't see why authors of derived works have to grant the additional
permissions. Where is that requirement?
To distribute
In message 20090324232043.2789e...@pcolivier.chezmoi.net, Olive
not0read0...@yopmail.com writes
Any derivative work is covered by the FLTK license and that include the
additional permissions. It is my understanding that you cannot change
the license at all unless it is explicitly permitted and I
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org wrote: [...]
- It seems it to fail the desert island test
This is not in itself a problem, but usually suggests it fails DFSG 1,
3, 5, 6 and/or 7 in some combination.
However, the FLTK License only *requests* contribution. It does not
require it, so I think
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:54:00 +
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org wrote: [...]
- It seems it to fail the desert island test
This is not in itself a problem, but usually suggests it fails DFSG 1,
3, 5, 6 and/or 7 in some combination.
However, the
Olive not0read0...@yopmail.com wrote:
If I understand it well; the amendments of the LGPL are not removable
(it is not explicitly said to be removable so by default it is not).
But It seems then that this license might in fact be incompatible with
the LPGL.
They appear to be additional
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:56:51 +
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Olive not0read0...@yopmail.com wrote:
If I understand it well; the amendments of the LGPL are not
removable (it is not explicitly said to be removable so by default
it is not). But It seems then that this license might in
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org writes:
=== FLTK License, May 2001 ===
FLTK License
Ammended May 4, 2001
The following ammendments to the GNU Library General Public
License apply for the FLTK library:
1. Modifications to the
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:56:06 +1100
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org writes:
=== FLTK License, May 2001 ===
FLTK License
Ammended May 4, 2001
The following ammendments to the GNU
Olive not0read0...@yopmail.com wrote:
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
I don't see why authors of derived works have to grant the additional
permissions. Where is that requirement?
To distribute derivative works you need a license (otherwise it is a
copyright infringement). The way it is
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:42:17 +
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Olive not0read0...@yopmail.com wrote:
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
I don't see why authors of derived works have to grant the
additional permissions. Where is that requirement?
To distribute derivative works
15 matches
Mail list logo
