On 22 Feb 2005 15:07:32 GMT, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If www.debian.org.uk wants to sell debian, then fine - I only
dislike them because they're now selling SuSE and Linux
consultancy without making it clear they're not debian (at
http://www.debian.org.uk/b2b/linux-support/ )
To say
Daniel Goldsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of that seems to have any connection at all with Debian
GNU/Linux, and IMO seriously devalues the Debian name by inferred
connection and/or approval.
Actually, if they just had the rest of it, I wouldn't be so
bothered and it's probably out of
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:28:32PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:12:37 + Andrew Suffield wrote:
Formally stated, it's approximately trademarks cannot make a work
strictly non-free, but you may have to replace all instances of the
trademark with something else.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:28:32PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:12:37 + Andrew Suffield wrote:
Formally stated, it's approximately trademarks cannot make a work
strictly non-free, but you may have to replace all instances of the
trademark with something else. Depending
Lewis Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would I be correct in saying that as long as copyright is not infringed,
it is fine to distribute art that is used as a trademark, as long as
you do not use it as a trademark. As a concrete example, if I were to
distribute 'foo Linux', that contained a
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:25:06 + Andrew Suffield wrote:
With this in mind, I would say Debian wants to stay in the former
kind of trademark encumbered works...
Thus, no trademarked logos in main or contrib, right?
Just to clarify, here I was referring to trademarked *Debian* logos.
* Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-20 18:17]:
I'm wondering whether there has been any progress on the Debian Open
Use Logo issue...
There has been some progress. Gregory Pomerantz, SPI's legal council,
has written a copyright assignment agreement and the arist of the logo
has agreed
* Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-21 22:33]:
Any plans for the trademark side of the issue?
I asked Matthew Garrett to work on an appropriate license. He sent a
mail to spi-trademark in August (and a follow-up in September) but it
never went anywhere. I'll ask him to send another
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:21:30 + Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
* Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-21 22:33]:
Any plans for the trademark side of the issue?
I asked Matthew Garrett to work on an appropriate license. He sent a
mail to spi-trademark in August
Hi all! :)
I'm wondering whether there has been any progress on the Debian Open Use
Logo issue...
Quoting from http://www.debian.org/logos/
| Debian Open Use Logo License
|
| Copyright (c) 1999 Software in the Public Interest
| This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 06:17:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
Last time we talked about the Debian logo issue, I almost came to the
conclusion that trademarks are orthogonal to DFSG-freeness.
But then, the Mozilla trademark issue almost completely changed my mind.
See also
11 matches
Mail list logo
