Hi,
Yaroslav Halchenko debian at onerussian.com writes:
My questions to the list now:
1. Do we have to list all copyright holders + licenses per each piece of
software distributed within a package?
The opinion of the ftp-masters ist that we do have to:
* John Halton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071118 17:34]:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:45:24PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071117 23:55]:
In addition, according to other posters in this thread the term
Urheberrecht is better translated as author's rights.
I
On 19/11/2007, Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is only a small part of Urheberrecht from what I can tell. What you mean
is what the law calls Urheberpersöhnlichkeitsrecht, which is only three
short passages in the Inhalt des Urheberrechts part of the law,
directly followed by a
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yaroslav Halchenko debian at onerussian.com writes:
1. Do we have to list all copyright holders + licenses per each
piece of software distributed within a package?
[...] we are talking about hundreds if not thousands of files with
differing
Hi all,
the final text of the GNU AGPL v3 has been published today by
the FSF.
The plain text form can be downloaded from:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.txt
The only changes with respect to the Last Call Draft (discussed in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00032.html) are
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:18:10 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Section 13 of the final text of the GNU AGPL v3 is quoted below for
reference.
My comments follow.
The usual disclaimers: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP.
GNU AFFERO GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:18:10PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi all,
the final text of the GNU AGPL v3 has been published today by
the FSF.
The plain text form can be downloaded from:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.txt
Thanks for the heads-up.
Do you (or anyone else) happen to know
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:26:21PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
The term user is not clearly defined. If I get an access denied
error page through a browser, am I a user of the web application? When
I visit a portal, am I a user of the browser? Of the portal
application, as well? Of the
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:56:23PM +, John Halton wrote:
Anyway, it's a cost (a significant one, in some cases) associated with
running the modified version of the Program.
No, it's a cost associated with *modifying* the program, as is the
cost of supplying the source code under the
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:56:23 + John Halton wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:26:21PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
The term user is not clearly defined.
[...]
Where do we draw the line?
I'm inclined to say, At common sense, taking into account the
intended functionality of the
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:35:35 + John Halton wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:18:10PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi all,
the final text of the GNU AGPL v3 has been published today by
the FSF.
The plain text form can be downloaded from:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.txt
On Monday 19 November 2007 02:56:23 pm John Halton wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:26:21PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
The term user is not clearly defined. If I get an access
denied error page through a browser, am I a user of the web
application? When I visit a portal, am I a user of
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:26:53PM -0800, Sean Kellogg wrote:
And, of course, web applications are often a large set of scripts...
dozens upon dozens of individual scripts. If I write a single new
script that adds some level of functionality, but in no way changes
anything else to the
[Please CC me on replies as I'm not subscribed to the list.]
Hi,
I'm currently trying to package gwyddion [0] and I got a REJECTED
because of incomplete debian/copyright file. To be able to fix this, I
would need some advice. Many thanks for your help!
[0] http://gwyddion.net/
The problems are
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:05:21AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
What if the application on top of the stack is just a thin broker
layer and any useful functionality is hidden in a backend that never
*directly* interacts with public users remotely through a computer
network?
Your
15 matches
Mail list logo
