On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Hi,
Anybody got a good advice for how to dual license some of the software
I've developed. I would like to use GPL for non-commercial use (e.g.
private persons and universities) and a commercial license for
companies.
Please
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:38:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
in response to Don Armstrong
I'm very sorry, the top posting was not intentional. I will also try not
to Cc: to people who don't want an extra copy.
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Svante Signell wrote:
I just wanted to know if dual
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:38:24PM -0400, astronut wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Jeff King wrote:
The latter message is from me. I am looking for such a license, as I am
trying to avoid ridiculous license propagation. My ideal license would
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:41:26AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:53:56 +1100 Andrew Donnellan wrote:
I think that KPovModeler was developed with the intention that you
have POV-Ray installed. It will work fine without it, but it can only
save KPMs and POV files, and
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:09:18PM -0500, Tom Marble wrote:
All:
Let me start by repeating the message that Simon and I gave
to you at Debconf: there is every reason for us to be friends
and working with you is very important for Sun.
big snippage of much good explanation and technical
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:24:26PM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
Hello,
The vdrift upstream uploaded a data tarball with some content licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 license.
After discution there are agree to relicense these files under GNU
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:48:43PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Laszlo Lebrun wrote:
Do you know about any jurisprudence about that question?
According to David A. Wheeler, the US Department of Defense has
recognised FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source Software) as being on the
same basis as Commercial
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:39:53PM +, Etenil wrote:
Hi everyone,
I contact you regarding a possible breach of the terms of at least the
GPL license on the Etch-based distribution Elive.
http://www.elivecd.org/Help/License
As you can see in the above link, the distribution is licensed
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 03:31:00PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Hello!
I packaged rtl-sdr [1] a while ago but I'm having a serious legal
issue. Some files related to DVB-T tuners don't have any headers and
upstream [2] didn't answer my call for help...
tuner_fc2580.{c,h} seem to
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 07:19:18PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
That means that it is for the FTP team to set that policy.
AFAIAA this is the best description of the FTP team policy:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html
My impression is that the type of issue currently under
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:07:52PM -0400, James Cloos wrote:
WL == Walter Landry wlan...@caltech.edu writes:
WL I found something here
WL ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
WL I do not think it applies in this case.
WL Cheers,
WL Walter Landry
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:45:14PM -0300, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I'm the new maintainer of devtodo and would appreciate an assistance of the
> debian-legal on the license matter. As noted, devtodo is licensed under
> GPL-2 only,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:42:52AM -0500, Scarlett Kelley wrote:
> My email account sk21rene...@gmail.com and scarlettdickinso...@gmail.com
> were hacked and they stole all of my crypto and used github and created an
> app called crypto kitties and the character octocat on GitHub I do not know
>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 07:33:45AM +0100, Jan Gru wrote:
> Dear debian-legal-members,
>
> I am wondering, whether you consider 'The Unlicense' [0] to be
> DFSG-compliant? On the OSI-mailing list [1] has been a discussion
> arguing, that this license model is
>
> a) not global
> b) inconsistent
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 06:58:19AM +0100, Jan Gru wrote:
> Dear Andy,
> dear list members,
>
> thank you very much for your reply and your thoughts on this issue.
> I want to pose two concrete follow/up questions if you allow.
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 13:00:08 +0000, An
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 01:38:28PM +0100, Adam Ant wrote:
>
[Stripping HTML formatting where I see it - could you please use plain text]
>
> Large portions of the core code base are labeled as LGPL-2 - There is no such
> > licence. It is either GPL-2 or LGPL-2.1
>
> A bit of history:
>
>
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 05:22:17PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 6/11/23 16:37, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:19:48PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I was stumbled on Söhne font collection, primarily due to ChatGP
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:19:48PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was stumbled on Söhne font collection, primarily due to ChatGPT
> uses it for its web interface. I'd like to also use it for hypothetical
> web app (let's name it foodb) to be packaged in Debian (due to design
>
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Borja Sanchez wrote:
> Dear Debian Project Team,
>
> My name is Borja Sanchez, writting from Spain. I am currently planning to
> run a paid course where I will distribute a modified version of Debian,
> rebranded and renamed. This software will be offered
19 matches
Mail list logo
