Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-20 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em 20-09-2017 10:56, Ian Jackson escreveu: > Herbert Fortes writes ("Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1"): >> [Ian Jackson:] >>> So I think that the situation is perfectly clear. Algorithms are not >>> covered by copyright (anywhere). The upstream a

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-20 Thread Ian Jackson
Herbert Fortes writes ("Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1"): > [Ian Jackson:] > > So I think that the situation is perfectly clear. Algorithms are not > > covered by copyright (anywhere). The upstream author is just being > > over-cautious in leaving in th

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-20 Thread Herbert Fortes
My typo: -over-cautions +over-cautious

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-20 Thread Herbert Fortes
> > So I think that the situation is perfectly clear. Algorithms are not > covered by copyright (anywhere). The upstream author is just being > over-cautious in leaving in that notice. > Why being "over-cautions" if the append is useless. That's the term I should use at first. It is the

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-20 Thread Ian Jackson
Ghislain Vaillant writes ("Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1"): > FYI, here is the interpretation of the license by the upstream author. I > asked about it back when I did the initial release, and no issue was > raised by the FTP team. > > https://github.c

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-17 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em 17-09-2017 11:24, Ghislain Vaillant escreveu: > FYI, here is the interpretation of the license by the upstream author. I > asked about it back when I did the initial release, and no issue was raised > by the FTP team. > > https://github.com/rjw57/dtcwt/issues/109 > > It would be nice to

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-17 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
FYI, here is the interpretation of the license by the upstream author. I asked about it back when I did the initial release, and no issue was raised by the FTP team. https://github.com/rjw57/dtcwt/issues/109 It would be nice to have this matter cleared once for all, as I don't want to have

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-16 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
The copyright you quoted applies to the code from the original implementation in MATLAB. This code is a complete rewrite in Python, so the original copyright should not apply. Not sure why this file is provided since the two code bases are different. Anyway I am open to hear from a second

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

2017-09-16 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi Ghislain Vaillant, > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-dtcwt" > > * Package name    : python-dtcwt >   Version : 0.12.0-1 >   Upstream Author : Rich Wareham > * URL