Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Also, the warning could include the patch name as a useful hint :)
Yeah, it actually was -- that's how I figured out the problem. It was
warning about the patch . :)
Ah, nice, then :)
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian, because
I went from being mr little too mr big boy within 6 months.
http://socorrohowtonfc.googlepages.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 454941 patch
Bug#454941: lintian: False positive
doc-base-abstract-field-separator-extra-whitespaces
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Author: rra
Date: 2007-12-08 21:18:31 +0100 (Sat, 08 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 1071
Modified:
trunk/checks/menus
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/lib/Spelling.pm
trunk/testset/binary/debian/doc-base
trunk/testset/tags.binary
Log:
The Russ's brown paper bag bug release.
* checks/doc-base:
lintian_1.23.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_1.23.40.dsc
lintian_1.23.40.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.40_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tags 454941 patch
thanks
I am seeing the same bug with swi-prolog-doc.
Patch attached.
Thanks, just uploaded a fixed version.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r1071 by rra
tag 454941 + pending
Bug#454941: lintian: False positive
doc-base-abstract-field-separator-extra-whitespaces
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping
Accepted:
lintian_1.23.40.dsc
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.40.dsc
lintian_1.23.40.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.40.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.40_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.40_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
lintian_1.23.40.dsc - source devel
Your message dated Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:47:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#454941: fixed in lintian 1.23.40
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Author: rra
Date: 2007-12-08 22:38:20 +0100 (Sat, 08 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 1072
Added:
releases/1.23.40/
Log:
Tag 1.23.40 release.
Copied: releases/1.23.40 (from rev 1071, trunk)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unarchive 444651
Unarchived Bug 444651
found 444651 1.23.36
Bug#444651: desktop-entry-contains-unknown-key: Actions
Bug marked as found in version 1.23.36 and reopened.
found 444651 1.23.37
Bug#444651: desktop-entry-contains-unknown-key: Actions
Bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
found 444651 1.23.39
Bug#444651: desktop-entry-contains-unknown-key: Actions
Bug marked as found in version 1.23.39.
Er, this is only a valid key in desktop files for things other than
Desktop Entry, which lintian explicitly ignores. If
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
found 444651 1.23.39
Bug#444651: desktop-entry-contains-unknown-key: Actions
Bug marked as found in version 1.23.39.
Er, this is only a valid key in desktop files for things other than
Desktop
Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 08/12/2007, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er, this is only a valid key in desktop files for things other than
Desktop Entry, which lintian explicitly ignores. If this key is in a
Desktop Entry .desktop file, it really is an error so far as I can
On 08/12/2007, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
found 444651 1.23.39
Bug#444651: desktop-entry-contains-unknown-key: Actions
Bug marked as found in version 1.23.39.
Er, this is only a valid key in desktop files for things other
On 08/12/2007, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 08/12/2007, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er, this is only a valid key in desktop files for things other than
Desktop Entry, which lintian explicitly ignores. If this key is in a
Desktop
Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 08/12/2007, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you point me to an example package?
Plenty of them:
$grep -lr 'Actions=' /usr/share/app-install/desktop/
/usr/share/applications/kde/ /usr/share/applications/
/usr/share/applnk/System/ScreenSavers/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r1073 by rra
tag 444651 + pending
Bug#444651: desktop-entry-contains-unknown-key: Actions
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Checking the generated report for
desktop-entry-contains-unknown-key[1] shows some common extra entries
like: Patterns, PreferredItems, PreferredGroups
GNOME-related apps seem to often use MultipleArgs.
lintian.d.o is completely hosed for desktop files at
Author: rra
Date: 2007-12-09 05:41:17 +0100 (Sun, 09 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 1075
Modified:
trunk/checks/menu-format
trunk/checks/menu-format.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/binary/debian/hello.desktop
trunk/testset/tags.binary
Log:
+ [RA] Warn about desktop files
On 08/12/2007, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 08/12/2007, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you point me to an example package?
Plenty of them:
$grep -lr 'Actions=' /usr/share/app-install/desktop/
/usr/share/applications/kde/
On 08/12/2007, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for being not as polite as I should be about this. The whole
process of adding desktop checks has been very frustrating (for everyone,
I think -- sorry to all the KDE people!), and I'm vaguely annoyed that I
even did it, but that's
Author: rra
Date: 2007-12-09 05:12:40 +0100 (Sun, 09 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 1073
Modified:
trunk/checks/menu-format
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/menu-format:
+ [RA] Add Actions to the KDE-specific desktop file keys. Add
Application as an acceptable Main Category even though
23 matches
Mail list logo
