Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2896

See Changes: [lamby] Drop depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives as it only -- [...truncated 236.22 KB...] Adding debian:GeoTrust_Universal_CA.pem Adding

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #404

See Changes: [lamby] Correctly warn about packages that re-use a previous version number. [lamby] Update legacy-debug tests for [lamby] Drop depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives

Processed: Re: lintian: Reduce depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives to pedantic

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 898136 + pending Bug #898136 [lintian] lintian: Reduce depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives to pedantic Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 898136:

Bug#898136: lintian: Reduce depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives to pedantic

tags 898136 + pending thanks Thanks all; removed in Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/fd56e1fc5f8bc4a43c9adfe6ab5958b6a762c042 checks/fields.desc | 10 -- checks/fields.pm | 6 -- debian/changelog | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 3

Bug#898136: lintian: Reduce depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives to pedantic

Paul Wise writes: > On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 19:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I just now checked, and the packages currently diagnosed with this >> tag [1] are 100% false positives, which makes me wonder if this tag >> should just be deleted. > I haven't confirmed this, but if

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2895

See

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2894

See Changes: [lamby] Correctly warn about packages that re-use a previous version number. -- [...truncated 236.83 KB...] Adding debian:DigiCert_Trusted_Root_G4.pem

Bug#889991: lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch

tags 889991 + pending thanks Dear Raphael, Okaley, implemented in Git based on your patch and description. I also updated all existing tests and added a bunch more for most of the corner cases: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/dba3e5fb07997d4c3c18926b6c38f2bc31f7ecf1 Best

Processed: Re: lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 889991 + pending Bug #889991 [lintian] lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 889991:

Processed: Re: Bug#898136: lintian: Reduce depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives to pedantic

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #898136 [lintian] lintian: Reduce depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives to pedantic Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 898136: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898136 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#898136: lintian: Reduce depends-on-mail-transport-agent-without-alternatives to pedantic

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 19:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I looked at the original bug report from Paul Wise (cc'd) (#892144), and > the motivation was unclear to me. Were there packages in the archive that > depended on only one MTA and weren't MTA add-ons or

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch-backports #403

See

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #402

See Changes: [lamby] Move homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri regex into a separate data file [lamby] Add non-HTTPS gnu.org to the list of sites we should warn about for

Bug#889991: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

On Tue, 08 May 2018, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Raphael, > > > + tag 'latest-debian-changelog-entry-reuses-a-formerly-existing-version' > > Can you provide a quick description for this new tag? :) Info: All versions for a source package must be unique, even with a leading epoch stripped off.

Processed: Re: lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 889991 + moreinfo Bug #889991 [lintian] lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 889991:

Bug#889991: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

Hi Raphael, > + tag 'latest-debian-changelog-entry-reuses-a-formerly-existing-version' Can you provide a quick description for this new tag? :) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Processed: Re: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the list of supported URIs for homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 898160 + pending Bug #898160 [lintian] Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the list of supported URIs for homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the list of supported URIs for homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

tags 898160 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/4a677f73d6b9044bce8c7766a411ab68b06fbcc8 Note the new "data/fields/insecure-homepage-uris" data file added in:

Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

Dear Russ, > Oh, ack, I'm sorry. I should have done a bit more investigation to > understand how this tag works before I replied and added noise. Bah, nothing to apologise for. Indeed, I also interpreted it the same way you did upon first reading and filed the bug away for a post- caffeine

Processed: Re: Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 898160 Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the list of supported URIs for > homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri Bug #898160 [lintian] Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri Changed Bug title to 'Please

Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

retitle 898160 Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the list of supported URIs for homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri thanks Hi Mattia, > I also got the same query via IRC, so apparently this really needed some > more words... I think it was more the ambiguous way "whitelist" in the title could be

Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

Chris Lamb writes: > Hi Mattia, >> I also got the same query via IRC, so apparently this really needed some >> more words... > I think it was more the ambiguous way "whitelist" in the title could > be interpreted (ie. should be ignored vs should be warned about). > Retitling

Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 06:46:43PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > (Still, "SSIA" comes across as a little... lazy! :p) No doubt, that's me and being lazy was the goal :P -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more

Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 10:24:21AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Could you say more? www.gnu.org redirects to https for me, so it seems > like one can use https when referencing www.gnu.org URLs. (I would be > surprised if that weren't the case given the goals of the FSF.) I also got the same

Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

Mattia Rizzolo writes: > SSIA. Could you say more? www.gnu.org redirects to https for me, so it seems like one can use https when referencing www.gnu.org URLs. (I would be surprised if that weren't the case given the goals of the FSF.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Bug#889991: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 22:07:52 + Chris Lamb wrote: > Done: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=1cadac3c48bf361c2894d56f2ef6fdf28bc32e9e This commit does not really implement what was requested in this bug report. The desired logic is this one

Bug#889816: lintian: Complain when epoch has been bumped but upstream version did not go backwards

Hi, On Tue, 08 May 2018, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > I think this warning was not in place yet when you made that mistake. > > > > This warning was added in 2007 so it's likely I just missed it. > > I doubt you missed it. > latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-version is really what it >

Processed: unarchiving 889991, reopening 889991, found 889991 in 2.5.75

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 889991 Bug #889991 {Done: Chris Lamb } [lintian] lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch Unarchived Bug 889991 > reopen 889991 Bug #889991 {Done: Chris Lamb } [lintian] lintian:

Bug#898160: Please add (www\.)?gnu\.org to the whitelist of homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.85 SSIA. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#889816: lintian: Complain when epoch has been bumped but upstream version did not go backwards

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:57:23AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > "W: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-version" > > > > > > Do you think it's still worth adding (essentially) an "E:" version > > > of this? I would tend to be in favour, given that at least I did not > > > see this