Am 7. November 2019 23:19:51 MEZ schrieb Felix Lechner
:
>Hi Chris,
>
>On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:07 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
>>
>> I do not understand the frequency that Christoph's checks
>> his email has any bearing here. Can you elaborate?
>
>Unfortunately, I can only speculate that he meant to
Hi Sebastian,
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:55 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> So please warn against Build-Depends-Package
> lines of this form.
You are welcome to provide input on tag name, description, severity
and appearance. (Fellow maintainers, please chime in too.) The
proposed fix is
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:07 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> I do not understand the frequency that Christoph's checks
> his email has any bearing here. Can you elaborate?
Unfortunately, I can only speculate that he meant to present a sense
of urgency. If a new release is needed, Christoph
Hi Felix,
> Since Christoph receives emails every six hours, a new release may
> be in order.
Thanks for addressing this. I did just release Lintian prior to this
change, but I do not understand the frequency that Christoph's checks
his email has any bearing here. Can you elaborate? I suspect
Hi,
The version requirement was dropped:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/33bd1434f0c160770a26bea55328e5bf7545322f
Since Christoph receives emails every six hours, a new release may be in order.
Thank you for your patience as we work to make Lintian better for everyone.
Re: Felix Lechner 2019-11-07
> Also, as a side note, would someone please explain why someone still
> on stretch would need lintian? I am personally on stable, but most
> package maintainers out there seem to track testing or the bleeding
> edge, unstable.
sbuild recently started running
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 10:49 -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Also, as a side note, would someone please explain why someone still
> on stretch would need lintian? I am personally on stable, but most
> package maintainers out there seem to track testing or the bleeding
> edge, unstable.
Well, at
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 18:44:29 +
Source: lintian
Architecture: source
Version: 2.34.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers
Changed-By: Chris Lamb
Closes: 943910 944094 944098
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:10:38 -0800
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.33.0~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:12:47 -0800
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.33.0~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian
lintian_2.33.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.33.0~bpo9+1.dsc
lintian_2.33.0~bpo9+1.tar.xz
lintian_2.33.0~bpo9+1_all.deb
lintian_2.33.0~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Chris Lamb pushed to branch stretch-backports at lintian / lintian
Commits:
0005945c by Chris Lamb at 2019-10-31T18:08:35Z
Open new changelog entry.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
- - - - -
cea51f81 by Felix Lechner at 2019-10-31T23:27:53Z
In Lintian::Unpacker, use Moo for object-oriented programming.
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.33.0_bpo9+1 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.33.0_bpo9+1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Chris Lamb pushed to branch buster-backports at lintian / lintian
Commits:
0005945c by Chris Lamb at 2019-10-31T18:08:35Z
Open new changelog entry.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
- - - - -
cea51f81 by Felix Lechner at 2019-10-31T23:27:53Z
In Lintian::Unpacker, use Moo for object-oriented programming.
This
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.33.0_bpo10+1 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.33.0_bpo10+1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
lintian_2.33.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.33.0~bpo10+1.dsc
lintian_2.33.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
lintian_2.33.0~bpo10+1_all.deb
lintian_2.33.0~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.34.0 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.34.0
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
lintian_2.34.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.34.0.dsc
lintian_2.34.0.tar.xz
lintian_2.34.0_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:19:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943910: fixed in lintian 2.34.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #943910,
regarding lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't
numeric in numeric eq (==) at
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:19:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944094: fixed in lintian 2.34.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #944094,
regarding Please exclude .path & .service pairs from
package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:19:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944098: fixed in lintian 2.34.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #944098,
regarding lintian: changelog-file-missing-explicit-entry false positive for
changelog with: 2, 2+deb10u1, 2+deb10u2
to be marked as
Hi Felix,
> Yes, we probably can but I would like to understand, please, why
> coreutils 8.30 (which, according to Andreas Beckmann, builds cleanly
> in stretch) cannot find its way into stretch-bpo.
Backporting such a big package (with likely lots of other changes)
does not seem particularly
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:33 AM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if that means that backport is really going to appear in
> > stretch-backports.
>
> That is my reading of it too. Felix, can we drop this requirement on
> coreutils for the time being? (I'm afraid I wasn't following the
>
Christoph Berg wrote:
> > According to Andreas Beckmann, coreutils 8.30 is in the process of
> > being ported to stretch.
[…]
> I'm not sure if that means that backport is really going to appear in
> stretch-backports.
That is my reading of it too. Felix, can we drop this requirement on
Re: Felix Lechner 2019-11-06
> According to Andreas Beckmann, coreutils 8.30 is in the process of
> being ported to stretch.
Thanks for the feedback.
> For details, please have a look at the PS here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943910#25
I'm not sure if that
25 matches
Mail list logo
