Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.81
Severity: minor
Hi,
Description says:
"""
The package is not safely binNMUable because an arch:any package
depends on an arch:all package with a (= ${source:Version}) or (=
${binary:Version}) relationship. Please use (= ${source:Version})
instead.
"""
We
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 895656 + pending
Bug #895656 [lintian] lintian: not-binnmuable-any-depends-all description is
confusing
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
895656:
tags 895656 + pending
thanks
Thanks! Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/875b580d192502ef8bfc3dfddd84b4ec705291df
checks/version-substvars.desc | 5 ++---
debian/changelog | 5 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Source: lintian
Version: 2.5.82
Test Case
When I build gnome-shell, lintian emits this:
C: gnome-shell source: maybe-not-arch-all-binnmuable gnome-shell ->
gnome-shell-common
But gnome-shell depends on
gnome-shell-common (= ${source:Version}),
I am told that is a correct
Hi Jeremy,
> Do you have a list of all the classification checks to
> help me reconsider?
control-tarball-compression-format
ctrl-script
data-tarball-compression-format
debhelper-autoscript-in-maintainer-scripts
debian-build-system
elf-maintainer-script
tags 895674 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Jeremy,
First, thanks for filing this; so much easier to work with these
various arch/any tags in email in my experience...
> C: gnome-shell source: maybe-not-arch-all-binnmuable gnome-shell ->
>gnome-shell-common
Next, have you noticed
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/800b1344880b70995c5a26754d2a891ae0ef7d5d
>
> … in particular:
>
> At this time, please do not attempt to "fix" the problem. It
> is not clear what the solution is (if any
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 895674 + moreinfo
Bug #895674 [src:lintian] lintian: maybe-not-arch-all-binnmuable emitted for (=
${source:Version})
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
895674:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I don't see how any of these (*) are useful to some wishing to
> uncover hidden problems with their packages.
I guess I'd want to know if the source format were not 3.0 (quilt) but
that's a rare enough issue that it's
9 matches
Mail list logo