Accessing the lab on gluck?

2006-05-08 Thread Max Vozeler
Hi lintian.d.o maintainers, I'd like to run a cronjob on gluck to extract lists of setuid and setgid files from the laboratory/binary/*/index files. Such lists would be very useful for our work on the security auditing team. The command I'm thinking to use is [0]. Do you see any problems in

lintian: r669 - trunk/debian

2006-05-08 Thread rra
Author: rra Date: 2006-05-08 22:22:20 +0200 (Mon, 08 May 2006) New Revision: 669 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: Set release for upload. Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2006-05-07

lintian_1.23.20_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: lintian_1.23.20.dsc to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.20.dsc lintian_1.23.20.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.20.tar.gz lintian_1.23.20_all.deb to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.20_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 196122

Bug#196122: marked as done ([checks/menus] verify doc-base files)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#196122: fixed in lintian 1.23.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366104: marked as done (lintian: improve out-of-date-standards-version to show current standard)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366104: fixed in lintian 1.23.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366233: marked as done (Please update Standards Version Check)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366233: fixed in lintian 1.23.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#365466: marked as done (lintian: wrong build-depends-without-arch-dep patchutils)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365466: fixed in lintian 1.23.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#365503: marked as done (xfonts-encodings is not a font package)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365503: fixed in lintian 1.23.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#321139: marked as done (W: yada source: missing-file-from-potfiles-in templates)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321139: fixed in lintian 1.23.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#365452: marked as done (lintian: Please check more strictly for weird file permissions.)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365452: fixed in lintian 1.23.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366481: lintian: Can't locate common_data.pm in @INC

2006-05-08 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.20 Severity: important Hi! Today I have downloaded lintian 1.23.20 from incoming and installed it with dpkg -i. Trying to test it with some packages, I've got: $ lintian qsf_1.1.7-1_i386.deb Can't locate common_data.pm in @INC (@INC contains:

lintian: r671 - in trunk: checks debian

2006-05-08 Thread rra
Author: rra Date: 2006-05-09 03:53:09 +0200 (Tue, 09 May 2006) New Revision: 671 Modified: trunk/checks/menus trunk/debian/changelog Log: * checks/menus: + [RA] Tell Perl where common_data.pm is since we're now including it. Doh. Thanks, Nelson A. de Oliveira. (Closes: #366481)

Bug#366481: marked as done (lintian: Can't locate common_data.pm in @INC)

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 19:02:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366481: fixed in lintian 1.23.21 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366481: lintian: Can't locate common_data.pm in @INC

2006-05-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Nelson A de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.20 Severity: important Hi! Today I have downloaded lintian 1.23.20 from incoming and installed it with dpkg -i. Trying to test it with some packages, I've got: $ lintian qsf_1.1.7-1_i386.deb Can't locate

Processed: Lintian bugs fixed in revision r671

2006-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian # Fixed in r671 by rra tag 366481 + pending Bug#366481: lintian: Can't locate common_data.pm in @INC There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact