Bug#344269: etch release policy: scripts must set appropriate #! line?

2006-06-22 Thread Frank Küster
Dear release team, we have not heard from you on this. Could you please clarify your policy decision? This was the central question: Release Managers, do you think that (upstream-provided) scripts with a Perl magic header like , | eval '(exit $?0)' eval 'exec perl -S $0 ${1+$@}' eval

handsome russsian Lady!

2006-06-22 Thread Ernesto
pretty-pretty ruussian Bitches! http://moreujazpo.info/xxlasian.htm?YbWQbjW-XjbWQ.gfibjW,VSd U.N.S.U.B.S.CC.R.l.B.E http://moreujazpo.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344269: etch release policy: scripts must set appropriate #! line?

2006-06-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dear release team, we have not heard from you on this. Could you please clarify your policy decision? This was the central question: Release Managers, do you think that (upstream-provided) scripts with a Perl magic header like , | eval '(exit

Bug#344269: etch release policy: scripts must set appropriate #! line?

2006-06-22 Thread Frank Küster
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dear release team, we have not heard from you on this. Could you please clarify your policy decision? This was the central question: Release Managers, do you think that (upstream-provided) scripts with a Perl

Bug#344269: etch release policy: scripts must set appropriate #! line?

2006-06-22 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought Steve followed up and said that yes, they're unacceptable, I didn't find any answer, neither in may mailbox, on debian-release, nor in the bug log. There were two anwers, from me