Hi,
On Saturday 22 July 2006 02:49, you wrote:
By my reading of FHS 2.3, no Debian-supplied package should be installing
files into /srv, since /srv is reserved for the local administrator for
local data. The error message may not be accurate, but it looks to me
like this still should be an
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 22 July 2006 02:49, you wrote:
By my reading of FHS 2.3, no Debian-supplied package should be
installing files into /srv, since /srv is reserved for the local
administrator for local data. The error message may not be accurate,
but it
Hi,
On Saturday 22 July 2006 17:35, you wrote:
How can that be reconciled with:
The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified as
there is currently no consensus on how this should be done. One method
for structuring data under /srv is by protocol, eg. ftp,
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 22 July 2006 17:35, you wrote:
How can that be reconciled with:
The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified as
there is currently no consensus on how this should be done. One method
for structuring data
Hi,
On Saturday 22 July 2006 18:34, you wrote:
Yes, and if you ship files in /srv, then your package is creating and
insisting upon a particular structure in /srv. Even if the binaries in
the package don't insist, the *package* is insisting.
Yup. That's a structure my package created.
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 22 July 2006 18:34, you wrote:
Yes, and if you ship files in /srv, then your package is creating and
insisting upon a particular structure in /srv. Even if the binaries in
the package don't insist, the *package* is insisting.
Yup. That's
6 matches
Mail list logo
