Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 344269
Bug#344269: lintian: false executable-not-elf-or-script warning with perl magic
header
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not
reopen 344269
found 344269 1.23.21
retitle 344269 Please reintroduce executable-not-elf-or-script with perl
magic header and change it to an error
thanks
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
reopen 344269
found 344269 1.23.21
retitle 344269 Please reintroduce executable-not-elf-or-script with perl
magic header and change it to an error
thanks
Did you check to be sure this was really in 1.23.21? After Steve's
response, I already
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 344269 1.23.21
Bug#344269: Please reintroduce executable-not-elf-or-script with perl magic
header and change it to an error
Bug marked as not found in version 1.23.21.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
stop
Stopping
Dear release team,
we have not heard from you on this. Could you please clarify your
policy decision? This was the central question:
Release Managers, do you think that (upstream-provided) scripts with a
Perl magic header like
,
| eval '(exit $?0)' eval 'exec perl -S $0 ${1+$@}' eval
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear release team,
we have not heard from you on this. Could you please clarify your
policy decision? This was the central question:
Release Managers, do you think that (upstream-provided) scripts with a
Perl magic header like
,
| eval '(exit
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear release team,
we have not heard from you on this. Could you please clarify your
policy decision? This was the central question:
Release Managers, do you think that (upstream-provided) scripts with a
Perl
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought Steve followed up and said that yes, they're unacceptable,
I didn't find any answer, neither in may mailbox, on debian-release, nor
in the bug log.
There were two anwers, from me
8 matches
Mail list logo