Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

tags 872611 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/1c071d9cb18cfc12ccf42a3bb2a358594ead461d checks/files.desc | 14 + checks/files.pm| 34

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

tags 872611 + patch thanks > Ah. Due to Bastien's referenc e to use cruft.pm I assumed that was what > was implied. Withdrawing my patch. Updated: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/merge_requests/12 (Appending .patch might work for you) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' :

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

tags 872611 - patch thanks Hi Guillem, > - You mention checking all "source files" in several places, but I >think you mean files in the binary packages? Ah. Due to Bastien's referenc e to use cruft.pm I assumed that was what was implied. Withdrawning my patch. > - The space removal in

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 10:37:43 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 872611 - moreinfo > tags 872611 + patch > forwarded 872611 https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/merge_requests/12 > thanks > > Sorry had forgotten about this one. Not sure which part do you find > > unsafe? The grep was just an

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

tags 872611 - moreinfo tags 872611 + patch forwarded 872611 https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/merge_requests/12 thanks Dear Guillem et al., > Sorry had forgotten about this one. Not sure which part do you find > unsafe? The grep was just an example, I'd probably use a regex similar > to

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 19:40:26 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 872611 + moreinfo > thanks > > Chris Lamb wrote: > > > > $ strings /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-private.so.0.0.0 \ > > > | grep sensible- > > > > Hm, is "strings" safe for this kind of thing? :) As in, I fear too many > >

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn for package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

tags 872611 + moreinfo thanks Chris Lamb wrote: > > $ strings /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-private.so.0.0.0 \ > > | grep sensible- > > Hm, is "strings" safe for this kind of thing? :) As in, I fear too many > false-positives... Gentle ping on this? :-) Regards, -- ,''`.

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Hi Guillem, et al., > $ strings /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-private.so.0.0.0 \ > | grep sensible- Hm, is "strings" safe for this kind of thing? :) As in, I fear too many false-positives... Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org /

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Hi! On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 09:37:03 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > > Patch is for me incompletewe must use cruft... So partial fix > […] > > I'm guess because the fix only covers scripts and not compiled objects > Do you have a testcase for one of these compiled objects? :) Sure, and sorry,

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Hi Guillem, > > > Patch is for me incompletewe must use cruft... So partial fix […] > I'm guess because the fix only covers scripts and not compiled objects Do you have a testcase for one of these compiled objects? :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'`

Processed: Re: Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #872611 {Done: Chris Lamb } [lintian] lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Control: reopen -1 Hi! On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 12:30:49 -0700, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Patch is for me incompletewe must use cruft... So partial fix Right, thanks for the partial fix though. :) > Sorry, I don't understand. :) I'm guess because the fix only covers scripts and not compiled

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Hi Bastien, > Patch is for me incompletewe must use cruft... So partial fix Sorry, I don't understand. :) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Patch is for me incompletewe must use cruft... So partial fix Le 21 août 2017 03:48:54 GMT+02:00, Chris Lamb a écrit : >tags 872611 + pending >thanks > >Fixed in Git: > >https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=f8ff3e873d4f8fdc6eeda6bea9e522afc34cb7cc >

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

tags 872611 + pending thanks Fixed in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=f8ff3e873d4f8fdc6eeda6bea9e522afc34cb7cc Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Processed: Re: Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Processing control commands: > owner -1 ro...@debian.org Bug #872611 [lintian] lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship Owner recorded as ro...@debian.org. -- 872611: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872611 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

control: owner -1 ro...@debian.org Will add a cruft check Bastien lintian and sensible-util maint On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.5.52 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: Clint Adams > > Hi! > > As

Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.52 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: Clint Adams Hi! As part of the long transition to split sensible-utils out from debianutils, the remaining Depends from debianutils was removed recently in version 4.8.2. I asked Clint whether he could send a