Hi Chris,
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, Chris Lamb wrote:
I could have sworn that already not all files in the patch/ directory
trigger such a message. But as I understand you right now, this is not the
case yet. So I am fine with it ...
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here. :) Can you
Hi Thorsten,
> I could have sworn that already not all files in the patch/ directory
> trigger such a message. But as I understand you right now, this is not the
> case yet. So I am fine with it ...
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here. :) Can you rephrase?
Best wishes,
--
Hi Chris,
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, Chris Lamb wrote:
This might be a language thing but I would not know what "patch
back" would mean out of context. Indeed, even when I am pretty
sure what you are trying to achieve (temporarily ignore a patch?)
yes, thats what I wanted.
I could have sworn that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 895758 Ignore files ending in ".patch_back" in
> patch-file-present-but-not-mentioned-in-series
Bug #895758 [lintian] lintian -- when is a patch a patch (HG)
Changed Bug title to 'Ignore files ending in ".patch_back" in
retitle 895758 Ignore files ending in ".patch_back" in
patch-file-present-but-not-mentioned-in-series
thanks
Hi Thorsten,
> W: libosmo-sccp source: patch-file-present-but-not-mentioned-in-series
> 02_set_version_explicitly.patch_back
This might be a language thing but I would not know
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.80
Severity: wishlist
My outreachy mentee renamed an old patch to:
02_set_version_explicitly.patch_back
lintian complained about that with:
W: libosmo-sccp source: patch-file-present-but-not-mentioned-in-series
02_set_version_explicitly.patch_back
I would like
6 matches
Mail list logo
