On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:17:09PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during the last discussions about LTS support, asterisk was not really
> mentioned. As there is already #816042[1], I wonder whether asterisk is
> still used and/or needed in Wheezy.
Was für eine Frage!
> So whoever wa
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:02:41PM +0100, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> I've committed to https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/publicity/announcements.git/
> the first draft for the announcement about the Squeeze LTS EOF. Please,
> take a look on it.
Why?
> I haven't proposed a release date yet. Nex
Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von xscreensaver-gl-extra 5.11-1+b1 (durch
.../xscreensaver-gl-extra_5.11-1+deb6u11_amd64.deb) ...
Ersatz für xscreensaver-gl-extra wird entpackt ...
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von
/var/cache/apt/archives/xscreensaver-gl-extra_5.11-1+deb6u11_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 05:24:33PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 30 March 2015 at 16:14, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Squeeze LTS misses a security-supported browser, so it's
> > usefulness as a desktop environment is fairly limited. Since iceweasel
> > is now a standalone packa
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 08:25:03AM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> I agree, it would be nice if we can just state that Jessie will have 5
> years of security support.
+1
> Another idea might be to see whether companies are willing to sign
> contracts to commit to Wheezy LTS or even Jessie LTS. W
> I have googled high and low and got no recent comment/thoughts/etc on
> whether or not there is even consideration of a Wheezy LTS.
If you would think about the idea of LTS you woul not have to think about
this google thingy.
> I understand that it would be dependant on the success (or not) of
