On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 05:24:33PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On 30 March 2015 at 16:14, Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Squeeze LTS misses a security-supported browser, so it's
> > usefulness as a desktop environment is fairly limited. Since iceweasel
> > is now a standalone package (and doesn't carry lots of xulrunner
> > reverse deps), that should likely be fixable for Wheezy (if there's
> > demand, though, since supportinh it will churn quite some time).
> 
> That is easily fixable even for squeeze LTS. Back when the LTS started
> there was what looked like a, negative, consensus as for what updating
> iceweasel concerns.
> Nowadays the blocking point for updating iceweasel is that python2.7
> is needed to _build_ the package. If anyone has an idea as to how to
> solve that problem while keeping Debian traditions, or without
> introducing python2.7 directly into squeeze, please let me know. I'd
> be happy to put my work hat on and share the work we have done for
> iceweasel for squeeze.
> 
> Cheers,

[another personal opinion]

As I am concerned as an absolut happy user of Deb6LTS: I decided to have
the TOR-Firefox being quite save und up to date. Nothing else I do need.
everthing else works absolutly fine being quite "old" :-)
Second and third browsers don't need X.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150409094605.ga10...@9398.at

Reply via email to