Hi Moritz
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 22:52, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:59:16PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > In any case, thank you for your help. Now I know that there are no such
> > plans and you would not object to the LTS team doing an update on
> > stable/buster.
Hi,
(why) isn't Ben handling the firmware-nonfree LTS updates like he does for
src:linux? He's also among the maintainers of both packages in the first place
:)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:59:16PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> In any case, thank you for your help. Now I know that there are no such
> plans and you would not object to the LTS team doing an update on
> stable/buster. This was exactly what I wanted to know.
*sigh*, ofc you should _not_ look in
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:59:16PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> To my knowledge there is no information in the security tracker whether
> there are plans to update the package or not and whether you would object
> to an upload. Just because it is marked as no-dsa does not mean that the
> package m
Hi Lynoure, all
Lynoure, thank you for your help. I have got the answers I need. Much
appreciated!
Moritz, Lyonoure, for the future, is there any way I could have improved
the questions in my initial email? I have re-read the CVEs quite a bit now
and I do not see how I could have formulated mysel
On 19/05/2021 09:38, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I only briefly looked at the CVEs.
If you haven't even looked the issues properly don't waste other people's time.
Seems things got a bit prickly here, so I'm seeing if I can do some
coordinating to make things a bit smooth
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I only briefly looked at the CVEs.
If you haven't even looked the issues properly don't waste other people's time.
Hi Moritz
I only briefly looked at the CVEs. I relied on that front-desk had
considered that the package needs to be fixed.
This means that we need to fix both the kernel and the firmware-nonfree
packages to fix the problems.
The question remains however, do you think these are important enough t
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:54:05AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi firmware-nonfree maintainers
>
> I have a question from an LTS perspective about the possible security
> updates we have for the firmware-nonfree package.
>
> You can find them here:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/
Hi firmware-nonfree maintainers
I have a question from an LTS perspective about the possible security
updates we have for the firmware-nonfree package.
You can find them here:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/firmware-nonfree
I can see that all the related CVEs are mark
10 matches
Mail list logo
