On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:27:34PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I do not think an upload without a DLA is a big concern. We have had quite
> a few of these when we needed to backport certain components in order to
> build some package. I think it was firefox but I could remember wrong.
> To my kno
Hi
I do not think an upload without a DLA is a big concern. We have had quite
a few of these when we needed to backport certain components in order to
build some package. I think it was firefox but I could remember wrong.
To my knowledge no one complained then.
You do however raise a valid concer
Ola Lundqvist writes:
> In this case I think we should issue one DLA and tell all the packages that
> have been updated at the same time. This require some rephrasing compared
> to a standard DLA but I do not think we should have a lot of them.
>
> This considering that we have fixed all the pack
Hi
In this case I think we should issue one DLA and tell all the packages that
have been updated at the same time. This require some rephrasing compared
to a standard DLA but I do not think we should have a lot of them.
This considering that we have fixed all the packages that require re-build.
Ola Lundqvist writes:
> I can also see a note in dla-needed for Thorsten working on automating go
> updates.
I did a bit of work trying to automate go updates on my system:
* Identifying what packages need to be updated.
* Downloading said packages.
* Rebuilding.
* Uploading.
But there is stil
or example golang-gogoprotobuf are rather questionable whether we
should fix at all.
// Ola
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 11:44, Sylvain Beucler <mailto:b...@beuc.net>> wrote:
Hi,
According to debian-security-support, golang packages are not
"unsupported" but with &qu
Hi,
>
> According to debian-security-support, golang packages are not
> "unsupported" but with "limited support".
> Currently some packages are updated in stable and rdeps are manually
> bin-num'd (e.g. #946467), see also
> https://www.debian.org/News/2020/20200718
Hi,
According to debian-security-support, golang packages are not
"unsupported" but with "limited support".
Currently some packages are updated in stable and rdeps are manually
bin-num'd (e.g. #946467), see also
https://www.debian.org/News/2020/20200718 for stretch-
Hi fellow LTS contributors
I have a question about go package support.
The question is whether we should try to support it in LTS or not:
According to this we do not give security support for go packages in
buster.
https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#
