Hi,
[personal opinion]
On 30 March 2015 at 16:14, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Squeeze LTS misses a security-supported browser, so it's
usefulness as a desktop environment is fairly limited. Since iceweasel
is now a standalone package (and doesn't carry lots of xulrunner
reverse
On Apr 7, 2015 5:47 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 17:24 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hi,
[personal opinion]
On 30 March 2015 at 16:14, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Squeeze LTS misses a security-supported browser, so it's
Hi,
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015, Jeremy Davis wrote:
My suspicion is that gaining further support may be easier if you do a
bit of a rally call now (rather than waiting until Wheezy EOL). I think
it's worth letting people know that Wheezy-LTS is a realistic
possibility but needs more support
I have googled high and low and got no recent comment/thoughts/etc on
whether or not there is even consideration of a Wheezy LTS.
If you would think about the idea of LTS you woul not have to think about
this google thingy.
I understand that it would be dependant on the success (or not) of
On 30/03/2015, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Squeeze LTS misses a security-supported browser
A number of web browsers that are present in Debian 6, are completely
unsupported.
These include, but, are not limited to, Arora, Rekonq, etc.
Each of those has its particular advantages,
