On 2018-09-27 17:27:46, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 27.09.18 um 17:12 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
> [...]
>> I wonder what that was all about...
>>
>> Was the solution for stretch finally to remove enigmail from stable and
>> use backports?
>
> AFAIK he hasn't made a decision yet and I doubt he will
Am 27.09.18 um 17:12 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
[...]
> I wonder what that was all about...
>
> Was the solution for stretch finally to remove enigmail from stable and
> use backports?
AFAIK he hasn't made a decision yet and I doubt he will use backports
because it's not for fixing bugs in
On 2018-09-27 17:05:08, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 27.09.18 um 04:52 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
> [...]
>> Enigmail's work, then, might be better targeted at helping the folks in
>> stretch, although I do wonder how we could possibly upgrade GnuPG 2
>> (required to get a new version of Enigmail
Am 27.09.18 um 04:52 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
[...]
> Enigmail's work, then, might be better targeted at helping the folks in
> stretch, although I do wonder how we could possibly upgrade GnuPG 2
> (required to get a new version of Enigmail compatible with TB 60) in
> jessie without causing all
So one problem we have with maintaining the post-XUL programs like
Thunderbird and Firefox is not only backporting the build toolchain, but
also the leaf dependencies.
Enigmail, for example, is broken since Thunderbird 60 landed in stretch:
