Re: libemail-address-perl, no "squeeze update of ..." mail sent, yet

2015-09-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Raphael, On Di 29 Sep 2015 13:55:06 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: Is there a reason that no "squeeze update of ..." mail has been sent for libemail-address-perl, yet, (i.e., when triaging the latest security issue in that package)? Yes, the fix is

Re: flightgear upload for squeeze

2015-09-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Chris Lamb wrote: > Here's my proposed debdiff for the flightgear update in squeeze: > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/lamby/0021615a8e1d4b7b260e/raw/4b38276c3a982f98208d6752ed492b0050ae5a5d/%253Cstdin%253E We prefer attached debdiff so that we can review just by

Accepted vorbis-tools 1.4.0-1+deb6u1 (source amd64) into squeeze-lts

2015-09-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:30:16 +0200 Source: vorbis-tools Binary: vorbis-tools vorbis-tools-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.4.0-1+deb6u1 Distribution: squeeze-lts Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Xiph.org Maintainers

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 317-1] vorbis-tools security update

2015-09-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
HI Raphael, On Di 29 Sep 2015 11:45:19 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hello Mike, On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: Package: vorbis-tools Version: 1.4.0-1+deb6u1 This package seems to have never been uploaded to squeeze-lts... You are supposed to wait until you get

libemail-address-perl, no "squeeze update of ..." mail sent, yet

2015-09-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi all, I just took over updating libemail-address-perl in squeeze-lts via secure-testing SVN repo. Is there a reason that no "squeeze update of ..." mail has been sent for libemail-address-perl, yet, (i.e., when triaging the latest security issue in that package)? Greets, Mike --

flightgear upload for squeeze

2015-09-29 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi, Here's my proposed debdiff for the flightgear update in squeeze: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/lamby/0021615a8e1d4b7b260e/raw/4b38276c3a982f98208d6752ed492b0050ae5a5d/%253Cstdin%253E It's a little more convoluted than I would prefer as I needed to backport a handful of utilities and

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 317-1] vorbis-tools security update

2015-09-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello Mike, On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Package: vorbis-tools > Version: 1.4.0-1+deb6u1 This package seems to have never been uploaded to squeeze-lts... You are supposed to wait until you get an ACCEPTED mail before sending out the announce. Did you get this mail?

Offering mysql-5.5 as an option in squeeze-lts

2015-09-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, currently we are shipping mysql-5.1 which is no longer supported upstream and which might have multiple unfixed vulnerabilities (Oracle doesn't disclose enough details to either verify it or fix them). We should really offer squeeze users to switch to a supported version of mysql and that

Re: libemail-address-perl, no "squeeze update of ..." mail sent, yet

2015-09-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Is there a reason that no "squeeze update of ..." mail has been sent for > libemail-address-perl, yet, (i.e., when triaging the latest security issue > in that package)? Yes, the fix is so easy that sending the above mail would take more time than fixing

Re: libemail-address-perl, no "squeeze update of ..." mail sent, yet

2015-09-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi again, On Di 29 Sep 2015 15:06:23 CEST, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi Raphael, On Di 29 Sep 2015 13:55:06 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: Is there a reason that no "squeeze update of ..." mail has been sent for libemail-address-perl, yet, (i.e., when

Re: libemail-address-perl, no "squeeze update of ..." mail sent, yet

2015-09-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi again, On Di 29 Sep 2015 15:06:23 CEST, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi Raphael, On Di 29 Sep 2015 13:55:06 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: Is there a reason that no "squeeze update of ..." mail has been sent for libemail-address-perl, yet, (i.e., when

Re: libemail-address-perl, no "squeeze update of ..." mail sent, yet

2015-09-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: > another question about this simple fix-up (SORRY)... > > As it seems the issue is only referenced via a TEMP-* ID [1] in the Debian > Security Tracker. Furthermore, no bug is referenced there [1], either. > And... the issue is already fixed in

Re: Marking TEMP-* issues as resolved

2015-09-29 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Mike, On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:19:09AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Hi Guido, > > On So 27 Sep 2015 17:03:51 CEST, Guido Günther wrote: > > >Hi, > >On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:42:20AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > >>Hi Gudio, > >> > >>On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:17:14AM +0200, Guido

Accepted libemail-address-perl 1.889-2+deb6u2 (source all) into squeeze-lts

2015-09-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:13:43 +0200 Source: libemail-address-perl Binary: libemail-address-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1.889-2+deb6u2 Distribution: squeeze-lts Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Perl Group

Re: Marking TEMP-* issues as resolved

2015-09-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Guido, On So 27 Sep 2015 17:03:51 CEST, Guido Günther wrote: Hi, On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:42:20AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Gudio, On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:17:14AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > > for the glibc update I'm preparing three issues that don't have a CVE