Re: golang-go.crypto / CVE-2019-11841

2020-09-14 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi

So the header is not signed. Good to know.

I think we can ignore the spoofing issue. Yes it is possible to spoof it
but on the other hand you can just omit it even if it is checked. I think
this is a minor issue. If at all an issue.

But as always I may have missed some important point.

The important thing is that the accepted checksums are strong. With that in
place I fail to see a security issue.

/ Ola

Den sön 13 sep. 2020 09:37Brian May  skrev:

> Ola Lundqvist  writes:
>
> > Looking at the code and your email I have some concerns.
> >
> > Isn't the header part of the "signed" argument? If it is not, then there
> is
> > no point of checking it since you can then just change the header anyway.
> > If it is part of the signed message it is possible for the function to
> > decode it and check it.
> >
> > Do the calling application need to do the check, can't
> > CheckDetachedSignature do it?
> >
> > Or have I missed something?
>
> CheckDetachedSignature is called like:
>
> openpgp.CheckDetachedSignature(keyring, bytes.NewBuffer(b.Bytes),
> b.ArmoredSignature.Body)
>
> b.Headers has the header we need to check, but we only pass the body
> b.Bytes and the signature b.ArmoredSignature.Body. As in the headers
> aren't covered by the signature (I assume there is a good reason...).
>
> Does this make sense now?
> --
> Brian May 
>


Re: Backports needed for Firefox/Thunderbird ESR 78 in Buster/Stretch

2020-09-14 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi. Any progress here?
Or any way to help?

Am 01.09.20 um 19:17 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:

>> It may be more future-proof, in case we need it for a future
>> rustc for the next ESR bump.
> 
> My gut feeling is the next ESR thing will need LLVM 11 or so, but happy to
> be proven wrong :-) So maybe let's directly move to 10 directly.
> 
> Once uploaded and acked threw NEW, I'll upload wasi-lib rebuilt against
> LLVM, then.
> 



(semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity (and missing DLAs on www.do)

2020-09-14 Thread Holger Levsen
hi,

today five packages were unclaimed for LTS:

- freerdp (Mike Gabriel)
- gnome-shell (Mike Gabriel)
- php-horde-trean (Mike Gabriel)
- ruby-json-jwt (Utkarsh Gupta)
- ruby-kaminari (Utkarsh Gupta)
- ruby-rack-cors (Utkarsh Gupta)

and two for ELTS:

- samba (Mike Gabriel)
- squid3 (Markus Koschany)


Then, two people probably claimed too many packages:

- Adrian Bunk with 5 packages: nss osc qt4-x11 qtbase-opensource-src zeromq3
- Mike Gabriel with 5 packages: freerdp gnome-shell guacamole-client 
php-horde-trean samba
(though 3 from Mike I just unclaimed.)

Finally, there were no DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published
yay!


-- 
cheers,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature