Re: weekly unclaim runs, shortening the time

2019-01-14 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

so todays unclaim run (with a timeout of 3 weeks) unclaimed nss and
tiff, I've bcc'ed those who had claimed them.

Then I tried to run it with a timeout of 2 weeks and I would unclaim
krb5, phpmyadmin and wireshark, which I didnt commit, despite I said I
would, as I've decided to give some slack after the holidays.

Next week I will unclaim packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity!

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:42:37PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
cc 
> As I have done this without problems since the end of November, while I
> also did test runs with 2 weeks of inactivity - which had similar
> results - I from now on intend to run it with "--unclaim 1209600" so
> that stuff with more than 2 weeks of inactivity will be unclaimed, as
> two weeks is already quite long (and updating a note is easy).
> 
> Please speak up if you think that's unreasonable or have some other
> comments.

& please excuse the top posting ;)


-- 
cheers,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


weekly unclaim runs, shortening the time

2019-01-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

so on Monday I've run my weekly unclaim run and it would have unclaimed
exiv2, then I got distracted and then, when I wanted to commit, the note
already had been updated, resetting the timer. Great.

Until now, I have run this:

./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 1814400 --exclude linux linux-4.9

which unclaims entries in data/dla-needed.txt with more than 3 weeks of
inactivity.

As I have done this without problems since the end of November, while I
also did test runs with 2 weeks of inactivity - which had similar
results - I from now on intend to run it with "--unclaim 1209600" so
that stuff with more than 2 weeks of inactivity will be unclaimed, as
two weeks is already quite long (and updating a note is easy).

Please speak up if you think that's unreasonable or have some other
comments.

I do agree we should aim for further automatisation in future here, but
I also don't think this is urgent. Patches welcome though.


-- 
cheers,
Holger

---
   holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
   PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature