Re: Request for sponsoring: beagle

- Mail original - > De: "Dylan" > À: "Debian Med Project" > Envoyé: Lundi 18 Avril 2016 08:11:05 > Objet: Re: Request for sponsoring: beagle > > Hi, > According to ftpmaster's comments, I removed the embedded copy of > htsjdk and I

Re: Last call for GSoC intern selection!

Hi Andreas, First of all i think you will pick the best candidate and due to my mid-term exams i can't contribute more sorry for situation after exams i'll try harder. I just want to say i learned a lot of things in the applying stage already thanks for your help. Best Regards, Canberk.

Re: Last call for GSoC intern selection!

Hi Nicolas, On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > > Our GSoC slots request has come and gone, and it's now time to make our > > final > > intern selection for both GSoC and Outreachy. > > Hey all, > > We have one unassigned GSoC slot available for each of the

Re: orthanc-imagej 1.1

Hi Sebastien, On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:14:05PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: > > Regarding the move to Git, I personally do not have any preference. Me neither. However, the thing is that if the orig tarball is recreated (due to removal of files) we can not ensure that we are working on

Re: orthanc-imagej 1.1

On 04/18/2016 02:43 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Uploaded and tagged. Please tell me if the packaging should be moved to Git. Great, thanks again! Regarding the move to Git, I personally do not have any preference. Maybe we could keep it in Subversion as long as possible to avoid any

Re: orthanc-imagej 1.1

Uploaded and tagged. Please tell me if the packaging should be moved to Git. Thanks for your work Andreas. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:01:57AM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: > Hello, > > I have just updated the "orthanc-imagej" package with the latest upstream > version [1]. > > Andreas,

Re: orthanc-imagej 1.1

I'll take this. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:01:57AM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: > Hello, > > I have just updated the "orthanc-imagej" package with the latest upstream > version [1]. > > Andreas, as usual, would it be possible for you to sponsor it? > > Regards, > Sébastien- > > > [1] >

orthanc-imagej 1.1

Hello, I have just updated the "orthanc-imagej" package with the latest upstream version [1]. Andreas, as usual, would it be possible for you to sponsor it? Regards, Sébastien- [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc-imagej/trunk/debian/?sortby=date#dirlist

Re: [MoM] Fwd: Outreachy project (CI for all biological applications inside Debian)

Hi Tatiana, On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:42:04PM +0300, Tatiana Malygina wrote: > I'm sorry for delay and not showing any response for some time, I was > unexpectedly busy :( Seem you found some time since I've seen your commit. Thanks a lot for your contribution. I added some additional

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#798167: camitk: depends on vtk 5

Hi again, Thank you both for your inputs. Mattia is right, I think it is the same problem that occurred in #821091. The bug was "solved" by reverting back to Qt4. Thank you very much Gert for this tip about the vtk macro! We were wondering what the magic made gdcm-vtk package compile on sid

Re: Request for sponsoring: beagle

على الأحد 17 نيسـان 2016 ‫23:11، كتب Dylan: > I also asked to upstream the source file of the pdf and he sent me a > docx file. I do not find any information about how to integrate > correctly a pdf from a docx file. So, I do not package the pdf > anymore. I suppose it's possible to generate

Re: jh_build seeks in .pc folder (Was: Request for sponsoring: beagle)

Le 18/04/2016 08:21, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Do you have any hint or is this a bug in jh_build? This looks like a bug in jh_build. That said, you could also keep the top level src directory from the upstream tarball and instruct jh_build to look for sources in this directory only. That would