Re: Table Information extraction tools in DebianMed?

Hi Nikola, On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 03:52:47PM +, Nikola Milosevic wrote: > Thank you for these information. This was very useful. So I guess the > conclusion would be to package Jena and OpenNLP and other Apache related > libraries that I use for the start, since they are dependencies of my

RE: Table Information extraction tools in DebianMed?

Thank you for these information. This was very useful. So I guess the conclusion would be to package Jena and OpenNLP and other Apache related libraries that I use for the start, since they are dependencies of my project. Later, I can possibly package my solution, and since MetaMap tagging is

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi Kevin, On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:15:12PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote: > > Andreas/Michael may remember differently, but from memory we will have: > > - SeqAn 1.x in src:seqan -> seqan-dev (only, no apps) > - SeqAn 2.x in src:seqan2 -> libseqan2-dev and seqan-apps (and one day -doc) Ahhh,

Re: Seqan2 (Was: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs)

Hi Andreas, (Sorry, our mails seem to have crossed in the ether!) On 15:12 22/07, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:40:40PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > > > > > - refers to v1.4, AFAIK version 2.0 is already in the archive, so this > > > one should probably

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi Sascha, On 13:40 22/07, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi all, > > [...] > > #811841 seqan: FTBFS with GCC 6: no match for > > > > - refers to v1.4, AFAIK version 2.0 is already in the archive, so this > > one should probably me closed. > > I don't think it is [1]. Anyway, AFAICS SeqAn 2.0 is

Seqan2 (Was: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs)

Hi Sascha, On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:40:40PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > > > - refers to v1.4, AFAIK version 2.0 is already in the archive, so this > > one should probably me closed. > > I don't think it is [1]. Anyway, AFAICS SeqAn 2.0 is intended to go into > a separate package

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi all, [...] > #811841 seqan: FTBFS with GCC 6: no match for > > - refers to v1.4, AFAIK version 2.0 is already in the archive, so this > one should probably me closed. I don't think it is [1]. Anyway, AFAICS SeqAn 2.0 is intended to go into a separate package seqan2 instead? Some of the

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi Gert, thanks for your gcc-6 fixing effort and the status update. On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > The current list of open gcc-6 bugs is this [1], I had a look at most > of them already. I'd say there is a "new set" of gcc 6 errors: #831100 [S| | ]

Re: Phylip Autopkgtest [GSOC]

Hello Andreas, I'll keep that in mind thank you. Best Regards Canberk Koç www.about.me/canberkkoc 22 Tem 2016 10:47 tarihinde "Andreas Tille" yazdı: > Hi Canberk, > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 04:54:42AM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote: > > I make a autopkgtestsuite for phylip but

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hello all,  Am Freitag, den 22.07.2016, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi folks, > > But we need to do more specifically the gcc-6 bugs are quite a > blocker.  I'd like to re-generate metapackages soon.  It would be not > nice if these would not miss the gcc-6 affected losses we currently

Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi folks, Gert and Sascha did a lot of bug fixing recently. But we need to do more specifically the gcc-6 bugs are quite a blocker. I'd like to re-generate metapackages soon. It would be not nice if these would not miss the gcc-6 affected losses we currently have (or will have soon). So

While we wait for Galaxy, two other F/OSS CWL implementations could be packaged

TOIL: https://github.com/BD2KGenomics/toil Arvados, from Curoverse: https://github.com/curoverse/arvados -- Michael R. Crusoe Community Engineer & Co-founder Common Workflow Language project https://impactstory.org/u/-0002-2961-9670 michael.cru...@gmail.com +32 (0) 2 808 25 58 +1 480 627

Re: Phylip Autopkgtest [GSOC]

Hi Canberk, On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 04:54:42AM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote: > I make a autopkgtestsuite for phylip but package in svn can you please move > it to git .Thanks for help. Moved to Git. I also uploaded clustalw. Please mind the following: Do not add anything to changelog paragraphs of