On 2 August 2021 2:28:13 am IST, "Steffen Möller"
wrote:
>Heya,
>
>@Nilesh, concerning extra files for testing I am just fine. Thank you
>for doing this.
Do you think it's good to go for an upload?
If yes, I'll sign and dput
Nilesh
Hello,
I know, PyRosetta is not free enough to be packaged, but I hope to
eventually revive an older project that uses it and would like to run it
on Debian. It seems like just two packages are missing - billiard, which
I have just addressed on
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python
Heya,
@Nilesh, concerning extra files for testing I am just fine. Thank you
for doing this.
On 01.08.21 20:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 10:27:29PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
I was not sure about the repository that should host this package. Med felt
wrong, Science maybe, f
Hi,
this is the call for the next video conference of the Debian Med team
that are an established means to organise the tasks inside our team.
We do these conferences twice per month on every
2th and 17th
of a month. Usually it takes us only 15-20min depending what we are
talking about and
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 10:27:29PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > I was not sure about the repository that should host this package. Med felt
> > wrong, Science maybe, for https://salsa.debian.org/deeplearning-team this
> > did not feel neither deep nor learnish enough, so I went for Python but a
On 8/1/21 8:17 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just prepared a package for https://github.com/google/ml_collections on
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-ml-collections.
I did a few changes, all commits should be self explanatory.
Only bit of an _ugly change_ I had
Hello again,
On 01.08.21 16:47, Steffen Möller wrote:
Hello,
I just prepared a package for https://github.com/google/ml_collections
on https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-ml-collections
. A review with an optional upload to New would be nice. It is nothing
too special, just so
Hello,
I just prepared a package for https://github.com/google/ml_collections
on https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-ml-collections .
A review with an optional upload to New would be nice. It is nothing too
special, just something that is on our way to AlphaFold, as summarised
on
>
>
> >From my discussions on reproducible builds mailing list, it needs to be
> fixed at compiler level, and there might not be much we can do here.
> So I'd suggest disabling reprotest for this package simply.
>
Thank you! I have disabled reprotest and pushed.
> Look at the logol package to se
On 8/1/21 4:57 PM, Shruti Sridhar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have written autopkgtests for segemehl[1].
> The package was failing blhc and reprotrest in the pipeline. I managed to fix
> the blhc error
Great! You seem to have understood the concept :)
> but I am a little stuck on how to begin fix
Hello!
I have written autopkgtests for segemehl[1].
The package was failing blhc and reprotrest in the pipeline. I managed to
fix the blhc error but I am a little stuck on how to begin fixing
reprotest[2].
Kindly review and let me know how I can proceed,
Thank you!
Regards,
Shruti
[1] https://s
On 1 August 2021 4:16:13 pm IST, Shruti Sridhar
wrote:
>>
>> For blasr,
>>
>> 1) Copyright is incomplete, you also need to add in a "License:" for
>> your files.
>> You can also see it in lintian warning here[4]
>>
>> 2) i386 build failure is legit, so you could simply disable the salsa CI
>>
>
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have written autopkgtests for estscan[1] and blasr[2].
> >
> > Blasr seems to fail build in the ci pipeline[3].
> > Could you please review and take a look and let me know how to proceed?
>
> estscan looks good.
>
> For blasr,
>
> 1) Copyright is incomplete, you also need t
13 matches
Mail list logo
