Le Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:52:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
>https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/resfinder/
>
> Both versions *.pl and *.py remain in source and it took me a long
> time to get an answer from upstream / our users what is really used
> and what should be packaged. See al
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 04:28:03PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > a single example which I personally experienced and had to discussed
> > with upstream which one is the right one to distribute. I do not
> > remember the software but if you really want to know I check my
> > mailbox on Monday.
>
Hi Charles,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 07:40:59AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> The goal of this policy was to make it easier to rewrite a program from
> one language to another language while keeping a compatible interface.
> We now have more than 15 years of experience on that matter with
> sci
> Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I admit I *personally* *really* hate this since I think I perfectly
> > subscribe all those good reasons to not add language extensions.
Le Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 06:13:45PM +0100, Chris Lamb a écrit :
>
> I share your dislike. Please file a separate wishlist bug for
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:24 AM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> in order to spare this boilerplate within the Med team.
Wouldn't it be better to lower the severity for scripts shipped by
upstream (vs the maintainer)?
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
[replacing lintian-ma...@debian.org → 958...@bugs.debian.org]
Andreas Tille wrote:
> > This was already done in:
[…]
> Not really (as Gregor pointed out since Info is also on the radar).
I've just marked the tag as "experimental". This has the same
practical effect of it being removed.
> To giv
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 5:57 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> I've written lots of mails to upstreams just to learn
> that I'm mostly ignored.
You are facing the dilemma of #907727, except a change would also
negatively impact your users.
Lintian may in the future automatically reduce th
Hi Chris.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:55:52AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> > I wonder whether we could this set from severity Warning to Pedandic.
>
> This was already done in:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/fd8ee67d96c713698f4c5e08eea0b0dafe02bdf4
Not reall
Andreas,
> I wonder whether we could this set from severity Warning to Pedandic.
This was already done in:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/fd8ee67d96c713698f4c5e08eea0b0dafe02bdf4
> […] So if you insist that this should be at severity warning I'll
> probably rather add a lint
Hi,
today I've seen the first time this new lintian warning:
mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Med Packaging Team
I wonder whether we could this set from severity Warning to Pedandic.
The point is that this address works not only as maintainer but rather
as k
10 matches
Mail list logo
