Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi Kevin, On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:15:12PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote: > > Andreas/Michael may remember differently, but from memory we will have: > > - SeqAn 1.x in src:seqan -> seqan-dev (only, no apps) > - SeqAn 2.x in src:seqan2 -> libseqan2-dev and seqan-apps (and one day -doc) Ahhh,

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi Sascha, On 13:40 22/07, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi all, > > [...] > > #811841 seqan: FTBFS with GCC 6: no match for > > > > - refers to v1.4, AFAIK version 2.0 is already in the archive, so this > > one should probably me closed. > > I don't think it is [1]. Anyway, AFAICS SeqAn 2.0 is

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi all, [...] > #811841 seqan: FTBFS with GCC 6: no match for > > - refers to v1.4, AFAIK version 2.0 is already in the archive, so this > one should probably me closed. I don't think it is [1]. Anyway, AFAICS SeqAn 2.0 is intended to go into a separate package seqan2 instead? Some of the

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi Gert, thanks for your gcc-6 fixing effort and the status update. On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > The current list of open gcc-6 bugs is this [1], I had a look at most > of them already. I'd say there is a "new set" of gcc 6 errors: #831100 [S| | ]

Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hello all,  Am Freitag, den 22.07.2016, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi folks, > > But we need to do more specifically the gcc-6 bugs are quite a > blocker.  I'd like to re-generate metapackages soon.  It would be not > nice if these would not miss the gcc-6 affected losses we currently

Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))

Hi folks, Gert and Sascha did a lot of bug fixing recently. But we need to do more specifically the gcc-6 bugs are quite a blocker. I'd like to re-generate metapackages soon. It would be not nice if these would not miss the gcc-6 affected losses we currently have (or will have soon). So

Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs)

Hi, On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:52:27AM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > Sure, I will see what I can do. How do you propose we as DMs communicate > the changes -- just push a new branch in git and ping the list? Sascha, thanks for your good work on several bugs - without counting it was more