Re: mips/mipsel in samtools and pysam

2015-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Afif, regarding bug #749367 of htslib I inspected the upstream discussion about the proposed patch[4]. I need to admit that I can not make any safe conclusion whether the mips issue is solved or not. The fact that the build problem remains (OK, according to #749367 there were 5 failures in

Re: mips/mipsel in samtools and pysam

2015-07-28 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Andreas, The build logs for the current versions of samtools and pysam (without contributed patches provided for the older release) show that building was successful on mipsel [1-2]. Building on mips has not been attempted for these two packages since htslib has apparently failed to [3]

Re: mips/mipsel in samtools and pysam

2015-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:24:38AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Why not just patiently waiting for the next upstream release ? The htlslib packages work very well on amd64, and this is where our work is used. Yes, but reverse dependencies are currently removed from testing. Bringing them

Re: mips/mipsel in samtools and pysam

2015-07-28 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:52:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : However, as far as I can see there in tracker[5] are more important problems in samtools affecting several architectures. According to Charles[6] this might be fixed upstream in the next release. I'm not sure how promissing

Re: mips/mipsel in samtools and pysam (was: finalizing pysam 0.8.3)

2015-07-25 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Andreas, On الجمعـة 24 تـمـوز 2015 22:06, Andreas Tille wrote: I just notoced that we did not cared about the mips build problem (#753490). Would you check whether the patches apply also to this version and forward them upstream. I did not forget about it and was planning to post an