Re: plastimatch/1.6.4+dfsg1-1 follow-up

Hi Gregory, On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:52:07PM -0500, Gregory Sharp wrote: > > > I admit if there was an explicit reason I simply forgot it (but its also > > for amd64, right). > > The architectures are amd64 and i386 because libinsighttoolkit4-dev > is only available on those platforms. If

Re: New version of ncbi-blast+ available

Andreas Tille writes: > Having some more testing in unstable before the freeze > might be something we should gain for. Certainly, but the remaining changes I have planned for ncbi-tools6 are relatively formal, so testing what's already in unstable should be sufficient for

Re: New version of ncbi-blast+ available

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:50:37AM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > My understanding is that going through NEW is necessary only when > *adding* binary packages; dropping the old -dbg packages certainly > didn't require it. As such, ncbi-blast+ might have to go through NEW > when it takes over

Re: New version of ncbi-blast+ available

Andreas Tille writes: > If you ask me under this cricumstances I'd upload even with FTBFS at > Hurd since the package needs to pass new if you remove the binary > package blast2. While it resides in new the FTBFS can be solved and > another upload can fix it. My understanding

Re: Will we manage to upgrade jmol

Andreas Tille: > Hi Ximin, > > at first thanks a lot for your effort to upgrade Jmol which is highly > appreciated. > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 09:33:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, I just updated Jmol in the above git repo. You can build it >>> yourself, or download it here: >>>

Re: Will we manage to upgrade jmol

Hi Ximin, at first thanks a lot for your effort to upgrade Jmol which is highly appreciated. On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 09:33:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote: > > > > Hi all, I just updated Jmol in the above git repo. You can build it > > yourself, or download it here: > >