[RFR] libgdcm-dev/3.0.8-2 (to close #989296)

2021-07-29 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hello, I pushed a couple of changes to gdcm [1], in order to address the important bug #989296, which ended up bumped to serious. I'm not 100% confident I grasped the problem at play, but with the window for bringing changes now closing, I'm afraid I can't afford spending too much more time on

Re: Autopkgtest for Yanagiba and unc-fish

2021-07-29 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:53:43PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > => Now, For unc-fish: > > Looks fine, but as you might notice, this package is not in the archive > yet. > The reason is the TODO mentioned in d/changelog: > > """ > TODO: Find reason for failure: > $ /usr/lib/unc-fish/fish -b

Re: Autopkgtest for Yanagiba and unc-fish

2021-07-29 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 29/07/21 09:40 PM, Shruti Sridhar wrote: > Hello! > > I have written autopkgtests for yanagiba[1] and unc-fish[2]. > > The yanagiba package seems to fail the ci pipeline. The error seems to be > from - > > dpkg: yanagiba-build-deps: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as > you

Autopkgtest for Yanagiba and unc-fish

2021-07-29 Thread Shruti Sridhar
Hello! I have written autopkgtests for yanagiba[1] and unc-fish[2]. The yanagiba package seems to fail the ci pipeline. The error seems to be from - dpkg: yanagiba-build-deps: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested: yanagiba-build-deps depends on dh-python; however:

Re: Removing r-cran-gprofiler from the archive?

2021-07-29 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Nilesh, On 28.07.21 21:19, Nilesh Patra wrote: [CC'ing Steffen who maintains gprofiler] Hi, NOTE: This is for action *after* bullseye release gprofiler description in CRAN[1] itself states that gprofiler is unmaintained and new users should use gprofiler2 instead. The only reverse(build)