Hi,
I did some work on smile (which I had to rename to biosmile, as there are
other (not yet official) packages already named smile).
From my point of view it is lintian clean and buildable by pbuilder. Can
one of you please have a look and tell me what things can be improved?
Thorsten
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2011/05/msg0.html
;-)
Oh great, thanks alot for that link.
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
I think the cmake issue has been taken care of after an hint from upstream.
Yes, at least it compiled with only a small patch under sid.
But this is a huge beast, it needed more than an hour to build on my small
VM...
Thorsten
--
To
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'd say for a first shot on this package which might go to experimental
this rpath issue might be ignorable.
Are you sure that a package with such an error can be uploaded?
Usually it is ugly to have upstream provided debian/ dirs and I always
try
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Unfortunately I am not yet able to commit anything after the alioth
rework. There is still an error:
svn: Can't create directory '/svn/debian-med/db/transactions/6851-1.txn':
Read-only file system
Uhmm. :-(
Any location for http download might do
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Steffen Möller wrote:
E: ginkgocadx: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
usr/lib/ginkgocadx/Plugins/libvisualizator.so.2.4.1.1
/usr/lib/openmpi/lib
So this is really an issue.
But I think lintian is wrong here. The error should just be
overridden.
No, the rpath is really
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
What exactly is the problem / error message if you try to commit?
It is still something like:
(...)
Sendingtrunk/debian/rules
Transmitting file data .svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Can't create directory
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Steffen Möller wrote:
They have somehow changed to some role based stuff ... strange ... I took
the role away and added it. Give it a try, please.
*sigh* that is really strange. I still get this error.
Sounds great! I am just having some ssh key issue myself and will
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Unfortunately I am not yet able to commit anything after the alioth
rework. There is still an error:
svn: Can't create directory
'/svn/debian-med/db/transactions/6851-1.txn':
Read-only file system
Ok, it seems to be that I am back. As usual
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hoping for somebody who cares about the
copyright file now ...
There are about 1800 files to be checked.
Are there any tools to make this task a bit easier?
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi everybody,
from my point of view package smile is ready to be uploaded now. Although
it might not be the most popular one, it is still on the tasks list and
somebody else might want to use it.
What will be the next steps? Shall I build the package and upload it
somewhere? What about the
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
to pay some respect to your efforts as a newcomer I spended some minuted
(the package was really well prepared so it did not needed more than a
small break from my usual work) to finally upload.
great, thanks alot.
Thorsten
--
To
Hi everybody,
thanks for all your tips.
I think I am almost finished now with the copyright file. The only open
issue is with file src/cadxcore/xmlrpc/base64.h
The author of this file is listed but there is no license mentioned.
Strictly speaking one may not do anything with such a file. So
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
Is there any special formatting or is it more or less mention license(s) for
any file distributed in the package ?
It should be in some kind of DEP-5 format. I am not sure whether this
format has to be applied yet.
Is this enough or is there a
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Steffen Möller wrote:
Formally there may be a problem. But I'd say it is fair to assume the
dominating license of the package or of that folder. Is it the only
contribution from that author?
Yes, it is only one file.
Just come up with your
Hi,
as I really don't like incomplete stuff, I did some work on dotur.
In case it shall become a real package, we need an ITP. In case this
software is useless now, it can be removed from the list of tasks.
What are your opinions?
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Olivier,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Olivier Sallou wrote:
I tried to rename one dir (ncbi-blast-plus to ncbi-blast+) with svn rename.
On commit I have an error:
can you please check whether you try to commit to alioth.debian.org or
svn.debian.org? In case it is alioth, you will get this error.
Hi Gregory,
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Gregory Sharp wrote:
Finally I got the Alioth ssh keys to work, but I had a trouble
uploading the directory into debian-med. Any idea what I did wrong?
from which host did you checkout your repository? If it is alioth, you
need to 'svn switch' to
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
it is included in BioLinux is a sign that it is used in practice. So
if nobody insists filing an ITP bug seems reasonable.
Ok, the bugnumber of the ITP is added to debian/changelog now.
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Olivier,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Olivier Sallou wrote:
Can someone have a look and upload to ftp master ?
I have to admit that I am not a blast expert so please excuse if I am
asking strange questions. While building your package I got some output
that I don't understand completely. Could
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
architecture seems to be amd64.
No, it is not.
Is there a reason why architecture is not
'all'
From the control-file: Architecture: any
But amd64 is the only architecture where this package builds up to now. Or
in other words, due to the
Hi,
on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/index.en.html in the Links
section is something written about Wikiomics.
Is the link to that website really added intentionally?
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm not specifically convinced that this is one that we should rank high
on top of our priority list. Anybody wants to prove me wrong?
it is just one index.php and some images of teeth. If you want to add a
date of a new tooth, you have to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: vcftools
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Adam Auton, Petr Danecek
* URL : http://vcftools.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-3.0
Description : designed for working with VCF files
VCFtools is a program
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
I do see packages compiling Lisp in postinst.
Can you please give me an example and do you know why they do it?
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Ira Kalet wrote:
I'm responding to Thorsten's attempt to build Prism in CLISP. It has been
done, but at this point you have to really know more about Lisp.
Ok, so I will help as far as I can and hope that there is a LISP expert
who can step in.
I will work on this -
Hi everybody,
it should be possible to build three packages for fis-gtm now. One is just
a meta-package, one is a package with the initial (precompiled) software
and one is a package that allows the binaries to be built from source.
If anybody wants to have a look, I would be happy to get
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
I replied on-list to Thorsten's e-mail yesterday, but my reply never
showed up in my Inbox. Did others receive it?
No, your first attempt didn't arrive here.
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
For the packaging itself I wonder if there is really a need for
asking for a user and group name for the fisgtm user. I'd say this is
not common (apache uses www-data, postgresql is using postgres both
without asking the user for a
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Well, there is no written law that we have to stick to this. While it
is a usual thing to do to follow upstream with his file layout of the
release tarballs, there are several examples where we derive from this.
There just should be good reasons to do
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Laurent Parenteau wrote:
I think it would be better if the packages would have the version number
in the name, and maybe have fis-gtm depend on the latest release. This
way, one could install multiple different versions of GT.M if needed.
you could already do
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
I do not know about examples, but I think the watch file would be
perfectly the same. Just fetch the amd64 file in the get-orig-source as
well.
Ok, I committed my first attempt of a combined package.
If everything works, the root dir has to be
Hi Laurent,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Laurent Parenteau wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Laurent Parenteau wrote:
I think it would be better if the packages would have the version number
in the name, and maybe have fis-gtm depend on the latest release. This
way, one could install multiple different
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Thus pinging the list if it is important to you might always help.
It does not build here. /usr/lib/libpng.so is needed but only
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpng.so is available.
The multiarch support was added on 19.07. in libpng ...
Thorsten
--
To
Hi Bhaskar,
sorry that I have so much questions, but I really want to understand your
philosophy. I copied paragraphs from some of your latest mails and put my
question/comment below:
[KSB] I am not sure what you mean by what other people choose.
(...)
So, there is no special GT.M user.
Hi Bhaskar,
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
For Linux, root.root is preferred and bin.bin is acceptable. Also, the
norm should be to allow world execution of GT.M.
ok, finally I have got it ;-).
[KSB2] I don't understand the part about calling the configure script
twice.
Oh, I
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
I just tried another test but things did not changed regarding the
Socket.cpp.o -c
/tmp/buildd/ginkgocadx-2.5.2.0/src/cadxcore/xmlrpc/XmlRpcSocket.cpp
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libpng.so', needed by
Hi Mathieu,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
lintian
/home/mathieu/debian/debian-med/trunk/packages/dcmtk/build-area/dcmtk_3.6.0-8_amd64.changes
W: dcmtk: duplicate-changelog-files usr/share/doc/dcmtk/CHANGES.360.gz
usr/share/doc/dcmtk/changelog.gz
did you do an update lately?
Hi everybody,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
To see if this might work I would like to propose a first IRC meeting
next Monday 29.8. at 17:00 GMT in #debian-med.
I thought I could break with IRC but it seems to track me :-). Anyway,
depending on the weather conditions on that day,
Hi,
I just found out that package abyss is currently not maintained within
Debian Med but still in the svn repository. As there are currently several
methods to mark packages no longer within svn (MOVED, README_git,
now_managed_via_git, REMOVED_FROM_DEBIAN.readme), I would like to restart
a
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Michael Banck wrote:
Should I remove the vmd directory from the debian-med repository, would
somebody else like to do this, or should there be some svn:externals
link?
if you don't mind, I would take care of that. That would be a good
candidate for the new
Hi Charles,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
I sometimes use a debian/DRAFT file in the draft
packages I upload, but would be happy to use debian/README.status instead.
I would like to separate the debian directory from the README.status. One
of my aims was to remove all unneeded
Hi Charles,
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
sorry to be a bit late to realise: I remember why I was putting files like
trunk/debian/RETIRED in the Subversion repositories of packages I migrated to
Git: deleting the trunk directory without waiting for a release cycle will
break the
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
I wished we could make some progres in med-his (regarding fis-gtm
Yes, next month I will continue with that project. Hopefully I will be
able to upload the new package by myself by then ...
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Charles,
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
I like to start mornings reading emails like this !
ok, I try my best to repeat that at other times :-).
I do not remember seing such and advent calendar before; I am sure it can
inspire other teams as well.
Out of curiosity, I tried
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
while it is not yet clear to me how the Advent calendar might be filled
by I would like to claim the next door (2.12.) for bug #639389.
Ok, but it should be the Debian Med Advent calendar and not the Andreas
Advent Calendar :-)
Thorsten
--
To
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Ahhh, OK. So I will see whether the upload to fix #648705 which I
wanted to claim for 3.12. will count in here because it was a bit
delayed when passing NEW (the package names have changed with this
upload).
The marked as done-email already arrived
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
As the star is part of the image, here is the link to the source:
http://debian-med.alteholz.de/advent-2011-original.tar.gz
which also contains the original original.
403: Forbidden
--- something is wrong with your server.
Urgs, that was a
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
Resolved circular dependency by recommending autodocktools instead from
depending from it. In case there *really* should be a strong dependency
this is not the correct fix and we need further work to split up
autodocktools in reasonable
Hi Steve,
sorry for any inconvenience.
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
I'd like to point out that some packages on debian-med have NO
upstream tarball, and thus the mergeWithUpstream property is not
needed. In fact, that's too mild. The property is *forbidden*,
because setting
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
I disagree. The build process is mostly automated and works.
There are more important things to work on. Promised.
My personal experience does not fit this statement.
1. Google: site:bugs.debian.org mgltools 'depends on python ( 2.6)'
2. Google:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
I finally came to the
conclusion that it makes no sense to pretend having a documentation
package if it is not maintained at all.
I guess the contentes should better go to some kind of Wiki.
So up, up and away
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
The trouble with this is that Source: unavailable does not describe
the situation. The source *is*, indeed, available. The distinction,
rather, is that there is no upstream tarball.
oops, I wasn't aware that the cmake file is all that
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
+# obtain build architecture to detect the right binary for installation
I guess that is not correct. Some times ago Bhaskar explained to me that
there are reasons to let the user decide whether the 32bit or 64bit
version shall be installed on
Hi Luis,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote:
I guess at some point we need to touch base with the
Debian packagers who has been working in fis-gtm,
to make sure that I'm not stepping in their toes...,
no, just go on. Any help from somebody who knows better what to do is
appreciated. I am
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
IMHO that's pretty useless and thus I
changed debian/rules to only install the tar which matches the
architecture that matches the build system.
There has been a discussion about this some time ago ...
(in my case
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
Just explaining my motivation - not insisting that this was correct: We
are currently talking about / working on the initial package to
bootstrap a real fid-gtm package.
Yes, but I assumed that we only wanted to have one -initial package. So it
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote:
Then went into the directory:
cd debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm/
cd fis-gtm-initial/trunk
and got the source code with the command:
make -f debian/rules get-orig-source
Ok, let me introduce my workflow here:
After doing
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
[KSB] Are there packages that are (for example) pure shell scripts so that
there is no difference between a source package and a binary package? A
VistA Debian package would be like that.
No, the source package always contains information on how to
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
This is because Thorsten decided to move the complete tarball straight
into the *.deb package which is a very untypical decision and I was
reasoning about this several times in this thread.
I hope I answered everything satisfactorily (I have to catch
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
I admit I also stumbled about this $HOME/.fis-gtm issue but was to tired
yesterday and forgot to bring this up in my response.
(...)
The alternatives system has the purpose to handle different alternative
packages. However, in the GT.M case there
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Eric MAEKER wrote:
May I suggest to add a startup date in the build logs available from
sure, would it be sufficient to add a line at the beginning of the logfile?
Just out of curiosity, at the end of the top page most of the time there
is a line telling when
Hi everybody,
according to http://valdarlab.unc.edu/software.html bagphenotype is no
longer maintained and shall be replaced by bagpipe. What shall we do?
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
Thanks in advance for any commitment
I am mentioned at the beginning, so everything is perfect :-).
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Ivo,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Ivo Maintz wrote:
But now it should be ready for upload (also to close bug #665837).
after building the package, I got some I:-lines from lintian:
I: libsbml5-dev: package-contains-empty-directory usr/lib/jni/
I: libsbml5-dev: package-contains-empty-directory
Hi Ivo,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Ivo Maintz wrote:
I: libsbml5-octave: binary-has-unneeded-section
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/octave/site/oct/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/OutputSBML.mex
.comment
I: libsbml5-octave: binary-has-unneeded-section
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Ivo Maintz wrote:
I use sbuild. I tested it just in an absolutely fresh setup; it works.
yes, sorry, my mistake :-(.
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Ivo Maintz wrote:
I fixed this. strip is now only called for this libs, if libsbml5 is
build with matlab.
Hmm, there seems to be a problem with dependencies (no swig found if
swig2.0 is installed).
The logs are at: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libsbml
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Charles Plessy wrote:
this is a typical symptom of mergeWithUpstream not being set.
*blush* you are right.
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
could somebody with more perl experience please have a look whether
perl-include.patch of meme really is as desired? Or is there another way
how things should be done in such a case?
Further the meme documentation (to be exact: overview.html) talks about
lots of small tools (-
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote:
It turned out to be easier to remove the COPYING file
as a final step in the installation:
override_dh_auto_install:
@echo I: Fixing up permissions for setuid rights -- we aren't done yet!
chmod u+s
Hi everybody,
now it is the time again. The days are closing in, the year is drawing to
an end and the Christmas season starts. As last year we should think of all
those, that are not around with their own kind.
Again, during the last few months, lots of volunteers all around the world
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
If I understood you correctly that you are collecting the bugs manually
(and not straight automatically from UDD which would set hard technical
criterion)
yes, it is still done manually.
I would suggest the following extention of the
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Eric Maeker wrote:
Thanks for the bug list. I found one for the freemedforms project
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686677
It can be easily corrected, but I don't really know how to send the patch.
I just had a short look at the
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Eric Maeker wrote:
All dependencies are corrected.
Ok
We just need to patch the control file and add a bug close in the changelog.
SVN files are actually for the 0.8.0, so we have to patch tagged 0.7.6
files.
Hmm, as 0.8.0 is already in experimental, I don't think
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Good luck with maven/java... See 693234#23
Hmm, and the ctakes-resources consist of 1GB of data ...
Is there an upper limit of tolerated package size?
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi Eric,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Eric Maeker wrote:
I've commited the rpath issue correction. Please, if anyone can make a small
test. Just compil, install, and run /usr/bin/freemedforms (or by the menu
entry).
doing a svn-buildpackage results in:
cp -a
Hi,
in order to keep an old tradition, I want to remind everybody of our
combined efforts to take care of some poor souls at this time of the
year.
As the years before we should think of all those, that are not around
with their own kind. Again, during the last few months, lots of volunteers
Hi Yaroslav,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
H, this information is new to me. If I have understood NEW queue
correctly than it is better not to touch packages which are in the
queue. Otherwise you might confuse ftpmaster or influence the position
of your package to get handled
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
in case an ftp trainee has checked the -1 version and now sees a new
one, he would not be delighted by this, as his previous work would
be just a waste of time.
is that from personal experience?
I just wanted to mention an argument from a
Hi everybody,
thanks alot for closing so much bugs. After taking care of 64 bugs in
2011 and 27 bugs in 2012, we reached a new all time high of 73 bugs this
year, BRAVO!
The oldest bug that could be closed was #541207 [1] which was the RFP of
fis-gtm dated from 2009 :-).
Season's Greetings
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Uploaded ... waiting for acception by ftpmaster.
So this is my moment to ask questions :-)
debian/copyright says:
Files: *
License: GPL-2+
But the accompanying commentary says something about GPLv3+ (as do the
headers of the src/* files).
On
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
GPL wise it's all done I think.
It's all committed including the new pristine tar 1.3.
wow, that was fast.
Please let me know if you find any other weirdness.
From my point of view everything is fine now.
@Andreas: I am waiting
Hi,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Thanks to Thorsten mira is no uploaded while I was sleeping my last
night in Stonehaven.
I was watching Super Bowl and due to the really boring game I had some
spare time :-).
Any clue how to adapt the watch file to fetch version 4.0?
Today
Hi everybody,
the whole project has the systemd-discussion and we discuss about
the packaging of fis-gtm :-). So let me ask some questions and I hope they
haven't been asked before ...
More precisely we are talking about versions:
fis-gtm-6.0 (currently in Debian)
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
As far as I have read Dominique's (and more importantly Thorsten's mail
who was perhaps partly wearing his ftpmaster hat, thanks Thorsten - I
was hoping for input like this) the question was rather rhetorically.
Oh, no, it was not meant to be
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
There is no big difference to all the other packages in Debian. Transitions
happen all the time.
Compared to other transitions, a transition from 6.0 to 6.1 to 6.2 within
one release cycle sounds really different to me. Besides, the older
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
Dominique's suggestion makes sense. There's no issue changing the latest
release and having fis-gtm reflect that, so that someone installing fis-gtm
always gets the latest release. My concern is just to make sure that
installing the latest release
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, olivier sallou wrote:
after several mails to upstream to clarify some license issue, I think we
will have to put readseq2 in non-free.
I didn't follow the previous discussion. Is it the file that is
available at: http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/soft/molbio/readseq/java/
Hi Stephen,
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, Stephen Smith wrote:
I would be happy to take a look at the copyright contents. However, I am
a bit new to this so not exactly sure which bits are missing.
In debian/copyright the maintainer must document the copyright holder
and license of all files in the
Hi Stephen,
lintian tells me something about:
W: phyutility: incompatible-java-bytecode-format Java7 version (Class format:
51
I am not a Java expert, but wouldn't this make the package unusable on
standard Debian?
Do you need src/jade/lib/libmatrixExp.so for anything?
Thorsten
--
To
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:42:22PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
bowtie2 has stuck in unstable because of change in supported architectures.
I've opened #742614, but haven't received any reaction so far.
Is there anything else one can do to force
Hi Steffen,
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Steffen Möller wrote:
package, which is all much about machine learning on biological sequences.
Those packages work, but are not nice, yet, in particular those are not
necessarily DFSG clean at the very moment. It is mostly about PDFs shipping
with the source
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
[amul:4] V6.2-000 is ready for upload!
And so I did. Thanks for your work on this
Hmm, AGPL code without exception linked with openssl doesn't look well ..
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi Bhaskar,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
GT.M does not require OpenSSL, does not statically link to it, and does
not in a strict sense, depend on OpenSSL. But there is a looser
relationship / dependency.
hmm, while looking at the Debian package, I found the following comment:
Hi Bhaskar,
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
[KSB] Those *openssl* files are versions of the reference implementation of
the plugin compiled with #include, #if, etc. configured to call call
OpenSSL. They are not actually linked to OpenSSL or other libraries -
linking happens
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
[KSB2] Adding a license exception to the COPYING file would probably
require me to go through Legal and that may add delays that increase the
risk of pushing us past the deadline.
Aah, ok.
Would removing the claim of copyright to the reference
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Does it matter that the bug was submitted against 6.1-000 and we are working on
V6.2-000?
No. We *could* have fixed 6.1-000 before (and it would have migrated to
testing then) but since you immediately started working on 6.2 I
considered it more
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
No. We *could* have fixed 6.1-000 before (and it would have migrated to
testing then) but since you immediately started working on 6.2 I
considered it more sensible to fix it in 6.2 which can close the bug
in the same manner.
Hmm, strictly
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
really sense - I'm no fis-gtm user. However, we agreed that for a low
popcon package it is not possible to maintain several versions
officially.
Does this clarify my idea why fixing the licensing issue in
fis-gtm-6.2-000 would be
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
