a worse solution could be to wrap TkMan in a script, passing the
output of /usr/bin/manpath to an environment variable. brrr...
#!/bin/sh
# wrap for TkMan
export MANPATH=`/usr/bin/manpath`
whatever to run tkman
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:57:47AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
TkMan author insists
Grab my task-laptop package for an example of how to do this. For x86 I add
some intel laptop specific packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[BTW this is a genuine bug with the BTS, not related to -mentors list, so
let's move off of it]
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:54:09AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
I (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) get flooded by identical copies of the mail attached.
I count about 40 mails during the weekend and I get
a worse solution could be to wrap TkMan in a script, passing the
output of /usr/bin/manpath to an environment variable. brrr...
#!/bin/sh
# wrap for TkMan
export MANPATH=`/usr/bin/manpath`
whatever to run tkman
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:57:47AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
TkMan author insists
Hello
I (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) get flooded by identical copies of the mail attached.
I count about 40 mails during the weekend and I get a new one every couple
of hours. Sadly I cannot reach the author as he supplied a wrong email
address. I tried some variations of it and mailed the postmaster
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 05:05:59PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
There are a few options, it seems: you could separate xmms from libxmms
(though
that would require cooperation of the other author), or build two binary
When you link it with xmms, it uses xmms, not only libs.
packages for
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:32:40PM -0500, ^chewie wrote:
Actually, have you confirmed that the function calls loserjabber is
hitting the libxmms or the mpg123 library?
It interacts with xmms in that way. mpg123? no relation with it.
What about the ID3 tags
library that xmms may be using
I've perused some of the dpkg-related documentation, but maybe I'm
missing something simple.
If I already am using automake (or otherwise adhering to the GNU coding
standards), shouldn't there be some automatic way to generate most of
what's needed under debian?
I'd like to be able to build a
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:30:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've perused some of the dpkg-related documentation, but maybe I'm
missing something simple.
If I already am using automake (or otherwise adhering to the GNU coding
standards), shouldn't there be some automatic way to
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Take a look at dh_make, in the dh-make package, and debhelper, in the package
of the same name.
That helped. Thanks. Now I'm working on the control file. I notice
that jserv's control file sets the architecture to any, even though
the deb-control man
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:06:22PM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote:
E: mozilla: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/mozilla/components/liblocalmail.so
I have 86 errors like that, how do I kill them?
(those are not shared libs, and will *never* be linked by ld)
Wait for lintian to be fixed so it
On 12 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take a look at dh_make, in the dh-make package, and debhelper, in the
package
of the same name.
That helped. Thanks. Now I'm working on the control file. I notice
that jserv's control file sets the architecture to any, even though
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm working on the control file. I notice
that jserv's control file sets the architecture to any, even though
the deb-control man page only mentions architecture all. Which should
I use?
Use any if you are uploading an arch-specific
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Take a look at dh_make, in the dh-make package, and debhelper, in the package
of the same name.
That helped. Thanks. Now I'm working on the control file. I notice
that jserv's control file sets the architecture to any, even
[BTW this is a genuine bug with the BTS, not related to -mentors list, so
let's move off of it]
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:54:09AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
I (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) get flooded by identical copies of the mail
attached.
I count about 40 mails during the weekend and I
Hi,
the packaging manual (v 3.2.1.0) says in section 8.1:
All fields that specify BUILD-TIME relationships [...] may be restricted to
a certain set of architectures. [emphasis by me]
From this I conclude that it is not possible to have a (binary) dependency
relationship restricted to a
Grab my task-laptop package for an example of how to do this. For x86 I add
some intel laptop specific packages.
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:58:52AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
I'm maintaining a package (bibtex2html) that needs the ocaml
compiler to build.
The ocaml compiler, however, compiles to native code only on some
architectures. On others (in particular mk68) it compiles only to
ocaml byte
18 matches
Mail list logo
